w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from July to September 2004 by author

Al Gilman

• please see XTECH archives for agenda for Wednesday's WCAG:SW:PF joint call (Monday, 9 August)
• logistics for next week's joint call (Thursday, 5 August)
• Accesskey examples from Web mail archive redesign (Thursday, 5 August)
• [accesskey] update for WCAG on PF discussions (Thursday, 5 August)
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? (Tuesday, 13 July)

Andi Snow-Weaver

• Re: Sept. 30, 2004 Agenda ************************************** (Thursday, 30 September)
• Re: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: [#828] Definition of foreground and background (Thursday, 1 July)

Avi Arditti

• Regrets for today (Thursday, 12 August)
• Regrets for today (Thursday, 5 August)
• Regrets for today (Thursday, 29 July)
• Regrets Agenda July 8th (Thursday, 8 July)
• Regrets: July 1, 2004 (Thursday, 1 July)

Bailey, Bruce

• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: A question on bypassing a group of links - IE work around (Monday, 12 July)

Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com

• Re: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Re: [#1059] Prohibit URLs with javascript protocol (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms (Thursday, 16 September)
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms (Thursday, 16 September)
• Re: Searching the list archives (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Tuesday, 14 September)
• RE: Scripting Techniques first draft (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: Agenda 9-9-2004 - regrets (Wednesday, 8 September)
• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms - more (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms (Friday, 3 September)
• Re: Agenda: 2 September 2004 Telecon - regrets (Thursday, 2 September)
• [#1021] css blink effects (Friday, 27 August)
• [TECH] What is the WCAG stance on blinking? (Friday, 27 August)
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text (Friday, 27 August)
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text (Friday, 27 August)
• [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 25 August 2004 (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Re: Agenda for 8/19/04 - regrets (Wednesday, 18 August)
• [TECH] Do we need gateway technique 3.1.2 Unambiguous decoding? (Monday, 16 August)
• [TECH] Updated end 2 end mapping of Guideline 3.1 with test cases (Monday, 16 August)
• Re: Access key background information (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: Access key background information - tables attached (Thursday, 5 August)
• Access key background information (Thursday, 5 August)
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: A question on bypassing a group of links - IE work around (Friday, 9 July)
• RE: A question on bypassing a group of links (Friday, 9 July)
• [TECH] End to end for 3.1 and 3.2 (Thursday, 8 July)
• regrets - Re: July 1, 2004 Agenda (Thursday, 1 July)

Ben Caldwell

• Guideline 1.4 and 1.5 Issues Summary and proposed resolutions (Friday, 17 September)
• Proposed Revisions to Guideline 1.1 (Tuesday, 14 September)
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 September 2004 (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Monday, 30 August)
• RE: HTML Techniques: General comments on July draft (Thursday, 29 July)
• Optional techniques - another proposed editorial note for the techniques drafts (Thursday, 29 July)
• Techniques drafts and UA information (Thursday, 29 July)
• July 26 - Updated Internal WD (Monday, 26 July)
• 1.1 revisions and issue summaries for next draft (Tuesday, 20 July)
• [techs] checklist prototyping - initial notes (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Thursday, 1 July)

boland@nist.gov

• process document template link re: test suite process (Sunday, 12 September)

bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu

• CLOSED: Issue #589 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #761 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #632 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #634 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #245 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #883 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #690 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #635 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #638 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #468 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #449 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #947 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #636 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #448 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #211 (Thursday, 30 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #219 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #828 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #680 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #605 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #620 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #222 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #619 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1104 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1087 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1084 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1101 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1089 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1083 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1102 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1093 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1082 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1092 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1090 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1098 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1097 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1077 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1091 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1086 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1095 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1099 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1080 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1088 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1076 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1079 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1075 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1103 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1096 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1094 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1100 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1085 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1081 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1078 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• NEW: Issue #1074 (Tuesday, 28 September)
• NEW: Issue #1070 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• NEW: Issue #1067 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• NEW: Issue #1073 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• NEW: Issue #1072 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• NEW: Issue #1068 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• NEW: Issue #1069 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• NEW: Issue #1071 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• NEW: Issue #1060 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• NEW: Issue #1064 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• NEW: Issue #1066 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• NEW: Issue #1062 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• NEW: Issue #1065 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• NEW: Issue #1063 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• NEW: Issue #1061 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• NEW: Issue #1059 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #751 (Saturday, 18 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #323 (Saturday, 18 September)
• NEW: Issue #1058 (Saturday, 18 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #751 (Friday, 17 September)
• CLOSED: Issue #323 (Friday, 17 September)
• NEW: Issue #1055 (Friday, 17 September)
• NEW: Issue #1057 (Friday, 17 September)
• NEW: Issue #1058 (Friday, 17 September)
• NEW: Issue #1054 (Friday, 17 September)
• NEW: Issue #1056 (Friday, 17 September)
• NEW: Issue #1054 (Thursday, 16 September)
• NEW: Issue #1055 (Thursday, 16 September)

Charles McCathieNevile

• The details are important Re: FW: ADA Doesn't Cover Websites, according to Federal Court (Tuesday, 28 September)
• unique titles / headings Re: 3.2 (Friday, 17 September)
• Re: erratum? Re: 04 Feb 2004 - Techniques (Friday, 17 September)
• (From diacritics to) simple language and grammar (Friday, 17 September)
• OnActivate Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] (Monday, 23 August)
• RE: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday (Wednesday, 4 August)
• Communication RE: gainsaying and Flash captioning (Saturday, 31 July)
• deaf-blind RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) (Saturday, 31 July)
• Re: Review Accessibility Site? (Monday, 26 July)
• RDF for transcoding Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Applicability of guidelines (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: InfoWalker "Broswer Companion" (Thursday, 8 July)

Chris O'Kennon

• RE: Back to business (Thursday, 5 August)

Chris Ridpath

• [TESTSUITE] Alt Text (Friday, 3 September)
• WCAG2 Conformance Test Suite (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Re: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] (Monday, 23 August)

Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)

• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Monday, 6 September)
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Monday, 6 September)

David MacDonald

• Gateway TECH's suggestions (Thursday, 29 July)
• Proposal for this fridays draft linking from Guidelines to techniques (Thursday, 22 July)

Donald F. Evans

• Re: Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 July 2004 (Wednesday, 28 July)

Doug Gibson

• RE: [#1059] Prohibit URLs with javascript protocol (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: Scripting Techniques first draft (validation and popups) (Thursday, 16 September)
• FW: [techs] scripts (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: [techs] scripts (Friday, 16 July)

Doyle

• Regrets - Re: Agenda for 8/12/04 (Thursday, 12 August)
• REGRETS - Re: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: [#828] Definition of foreground and background (Thursday, 1 July)
• Re: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? (Thursday, 1 July)

Doyle-Work

• REGRETS - Re: Agenda: 26 August 2004 Telecon (Thursday, 26 August)

Fentress, Robert

• RE: proper use of <u> and <i> elements (Thursday, 5 August)
• proper use of <u> and <i> elements (Wednesday, 4 August)
• RE: deaf-blind RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) (Saturday, 31 July)
• Review Accessibility Site? (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Friday, 23 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Monday, 19 July)
• correction (Thursday, 8 July)
• Revised collapsible menu nav script (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: [techs] Re: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: [techs] Re: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• List Markup to Achieve Skip Repetitive Navigation Links Functionality (Friday, 2 July)

Geoff Deering

• Regrets (Wednesday, 7 July)

Gez Lemon

• Re: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Re: Long description and image on same page (was RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004) (Thursday, 23 September)
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 (Thursday, 23 September)
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms - more (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms (Wednesday, 1 September)
• Re: Monday, 30 August brainstorm about conformance profiles (Saturday, 28 August)
• Re: [#1021] css blink effects (Friday, 27 August)
• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters (Tuesday, 24 August)

gl@juicystudio.com

• regrets RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 29 September 2004 (Wednesday, 29 September)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• Sept. 30, 2004 Agenda ************************************** (Wednesday, 29 September)
• RE: Issue #1099 (where acronym are ambiguous...) (Wednesday, 29 September)
• RE: ADA Doesn't Cover Websites, according to Federal Court (Tuesday, 28 September)
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Agenda - September 23, 2004 ****** (Wednesday, 22 September)
• programmatically determined or determined programmatically. (Friday, 17 September)
• FW: 1.4 and 1.5 combination proposal (Friday, 17 September)
• September 16, 2004 - Agenda (Tuesday, 14 September)
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 (Sunday, 12 September)
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 (Sunday, 12 September)
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 (Saturday, 11 September)
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 (Saturday, 11 September)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 10 September)
• RE: [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content (Thursday, 9 September)
• Agenda 9-9-2004 (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: Postscript RE: Proposal: purpose and approach for Gateway (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Friday, 3 September)
• RE: [Techs] Draft Gateway Techniques for Guideline 1.3 (Tuesday, 31 August)
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Tuesday, 31 August)
• RE: [Techs] Draft Gateway Techniques for Guideline 1.3 (Monday, 30 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• Agenda for 8/19/04 (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: Request for feedback on Gateway to Techniques working draft (Wednesday, 18 August)
• Agenda for 8/12/04 (Wednesday, 11 August)
• 3 to 2 (Tuesday, 10 August)
• RE: Conformance level: statement needs change? (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon (Wednesday, 4 August)
• RE: Searching guidelines and techniques (Wednesday, 4 August)
• RE: Searching guidelines and techniques (Wednesday, 4 August)
• Back to business (Saturday, 31 July)
• RE: WCAG WG discussion of "authored unit" (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: optgroup (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: Gateway Techniques draft: responses to two editorial notes (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Techniques drafts and UA information (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: Meaning and scope of "authored unit" (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 (Sunday, 25 July)
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 (Sunday, 25 July)
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 (Sunday, 25 July)
• RE: Meaning and scope of "authored unit" (Sunday, 25 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Sunday, 25 July)
• Heat and Light (Thursday, 22 July)
• Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: having slept on the conversation.... (Wednesday, 14 July)
• No WG Telecon this week since we are meeting in Face to face. (Wednesday, 14 July)
• FW: Carrot Browsing Mode and Tables. (Saturday, 10 July)
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording (Friday, 9 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording (Wednesday, 7 July)
• AGENDA JULY 8th (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Friday, 2 July)
• Topics for Face - to - face call for comments to the list. (Thursday, 1 July)
• RE: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? (Thursday, 1 July)

Håkon Wium Lie

• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Monday, 6 September)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Thursday, 2 September)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Thursday, 2 September)

Ineke van der Maat

• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• xhtml basic (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Friday, 2 July)

Isofarro

• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Monday, 13 September)
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Monday, 13 September)
• Re: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Saturday, 24 July)

James Craig

• Re: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: Searching the list archives (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Monday, 13 September)
• Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] (Monday, 23 August)
• Re: [techs] scripts (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: A question on bypassing a group of links (Friday, 9 July)
• Glossary addition proposal for "link" (Was: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc.) (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: [techs] Re: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• [techs] Re: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• Re: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Friday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Friday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Friday, 2 July)

Jan Richards

• Comments on WCAG 2.0 Working Draft by WAI AUWG (Tuesday, 17 August)

Jason White

• Re: unique titles / headings Re: 3.2 (Saturday, 18 September)
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 (Sunday, 12 September)
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 (Sunday, 12 September)
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 (Sunday, 12 September)
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 (Saturday, 11 September)
• Re: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 (Saturday, 11 September)
• RE: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 (Saturday, 11 September)
• First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 level 1 (Friday, 10 September)
• Re: Application of content profile ideas to specific content types (Friday, 10 September)
• RE: Intro to WCAG 2.0 [was Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0]] (Sunday, 5 September)
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4- skip nav (Saturday, 4 September)
• RE: Intro to WCAG 2.0 [was Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0]] (Saturday, 4 September)
• Re: [1.2] issue summary and proposal (Friday, 3 September)
• Application of content profile ideas to specific content types (Wednesday, 1 September)
• Possible characteristics to be used in conformance profiles (Wednesday, 1 September)
• RE: Guideline 2.4 L2, SC2 Skip nav link (Monday, 30 August)
• Re: Guideline 2.4 L2, SC2 Skip nav link (Monday, 30 August)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) (Monday, 30 August)
• Thoughts on conformance profiles (Saturday, 28 August)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] (Tuesday, 24 August)
• RE: techniques for better as well as for good [was: Re: programaticallylocated.doc] (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: Searching guidelines and techniques (Wednesday, 4 August)
• RE: WCAG WG discussion of "authored unit" (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: Agenda: 29 July 2004 WCAG WG telecon (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: Meaning and scope of "authored unit" (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: Meaning and scope of "authored unit" (Monday, 26 July)
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 (Monday, 26 July)
• Meaning and scope of "authored unit" (Sunday, 25 July)
• Problems with guideline 4.1 (Sunday, 25 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Sunday, 25 July)
• Issues with guideline 4.2 (Sunday, 25 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Sunday, 25 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Friday, 23 July)
• Re: [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims (Thursday, 15 July)
• Re: Fw: having slept on the conversation.... (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Content selection (Saturday, 10 July)
• RE: Applicability of guidelines (Saturday, 10 July)
• Applicability of guidelines (Friday, 9 July)
• Re: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: [#830] Requirement for page title should be level 2 or level 1 (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording (Wednesday, 7 July)
• Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Monday, 5 July)
• Re: Topics for Face - to - face call for comments to the list. (Thursday, 1 July)

Jenae Andershonis

• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 September 2004 (Wednesday, 1 September)
• [techs] Continuing the End to End (E2E) Process (Wednesday, 4 August)
• [techs] Action Item from July techniques F2F: End to End for 1.1 (Phases 1-5) (Friday, 23 July)

Jens Meiert

• Re: [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content (without typos) (Thursday, 9 September)
• Re: [#925] mandatory H1 (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Wednesday, 25 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• Fwd: Re: [css techs] new draft for discussion, list of to dos (Comments) (Saturday, 7 August)
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• Re: [css techs] new draft for discussion, list of to dos (Comments) (Wednesday, 21 July)
• Re: Clear link text - my thoughts (Friday, 2 July)

Jim Allan

• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) (Friday, 27 August)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) (Thursday, 26 August)

Jim Ley

• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Monday, 13 September)
• Re: [techs] scripts (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? (Monday, 19 July)
• Re: [techs] scripts (Saturday, 17 July)
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? (Saturday, 10 July)

Jim Thatcher

• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Wednesday, 1 September)
• [techs] Auto submit combo boxes - Bugzilla 272 (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: A question on bypassing a group of links - IE work around (Friday, 9 July)
• RE: A question on bypassing a group of links (Monday, 5 July)
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Friday, 2 July)

Joe Clark

• Re: Long description and image on same page (was RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004) (Friday, 24 September)
• Re: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [#1065] Provide a link to download an accessible plugin (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 September 2004 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• Re: First draft: proposal for guideline 4.2 (Friday, 10 September)
• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4- skip nav (Saturday, 4 September)
• Re: [1.2] issue summary and proposal (Thursday, 2 September)
• Best practices in online captioning (Thursday, 2 September)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Wednesday, 25 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Wednesday, 25 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Friday, 20 August)
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: "Multimedia alternatives" in 1.1 (was Re: Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "explicitly associated") (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Re: "Multimedia alternatives" in 1.1 (was Re: Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "explicitly associated") (Monday, 9 August)
• Re: CSS generated content (Thursday, 5 August)
• Re: Back to business (Thursday, 5 August)
• Re: proper use of <u> and <i> elements (Thursday, 5 August)
• RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) (Friday, 30 July)
• Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) (Thursday, 29 July)
• optgrou (was: Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques) (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Thursday, 8 July)
• Re: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)

John M Slatin

• FW: ADA Doesn't Cover Websites, according to Federal Court (Monday, 27 September)
• RE: Long description and image on same page (was RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004) (Thursday, 23 September)
• Long description and image on same page (was RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004) (Thursday, 23 September)
• RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: Guideline 1.4 and 1.5 Issues Summary and proposed resolutions (Friday, 17 September)
• RE: programmatically determined or determined programmatically. (Friday, 17 September)
• RE: Searching the list archives (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Searching the list archives (Wednesday, 15 September)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Postscript RE: Proposal: purpose and approach for Gateway (Monday, 6 September)
• Proposal: purpose and approach for Gateway (Monday, 6 September)
• RE: Intro to WCAG 2.0 [was Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0]] (Saturday, 4 September)
• RE: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms (Friday, 3 September)
• RE: Intro to WCAG 2.0 [was Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0]] (Friday, 3 September)
• RE: [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms (Thursday, 2 September)
• [Techs] CSS and invisible labels for forms (Wednesday, 1 September)
• RE: [Techs] Draft Gateway Techniques for Guideline 1.3 (Wednesday, 1 September)
• RE: [Techs] Draft Gateway Techniques for Guideline 1.3 (Tuesday, 31 August)
• [Techs] Draft Gateway Techniques for Guideline 1.3 (Monday, 30 August)
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text (Friday, 27 August)
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text (Friday, 27 August)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: Request for feedback on Gateway to Techniques working draft (Wednesday, 18 August)
• Request for feedback on Gateway to Techniques working draft (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: accessibility issue? (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: accessibility issue? (Wednesday, 18 August)
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element (Monday, 16 August)
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element (Monday, 16 August)
• [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element (Monday, 16 August)
• FW: USE OF ACCESSIBLE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS AVAILABLE: New Microsoft & Forrester Research Study (Monday, 16 August)
• FW: [techlunch] Usability & Accessibility Working Group announces launch of new web site (Sunday, 15 August)
• RE: Agenda for 8/12/04 (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Programmatically located and user agents (Monday, 9 August)
• RE: "Multimedia alternatives" in 1.1 (was Re: Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "explicitly associated") (Monday, 9 August)
• "Multimedia alternatives" in 1.1 (was Re: Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "explicitly associated") (Monday, 9 August)
• RE: Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "programmatically identified" (Monday, 9 August)
• Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "explicitly associated" (Monday, 9 August)
• Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "programmatically determined" (Monday, 9 August)
• Re issue 330: Proposed wording to replace "derived programmatically" (Monday, 9 August)
• Re issue 330: proposed wording to replace "programmatically identified" (Monday, 9 August)
• RE: proper use of <u> and <i> elements (Wednesday, 4 August)
• RE: Searching guidelines and techniques (Wednesday, 4 August)
• RE: Searching guidelines and techniques (Wednesday, 4 August)
• Searching guidelines and techniques (Tuesday, 3 August)
• FW: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday (Tuesday, 3 August)
• RE: Communication RE: gainsaying and Flash captioning (Saturday, 31 July)
• RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: contain edits to HTML techs: Fwd: Proposed changes to Gateway Techniques draft (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Gateway Techniques draft: responses to two editorial notes (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Optional techniques - another proposed editorial note for the techniques drafts (Thursday, 29 July)
• HTML Techniques: General comments on July draft (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Techniques drafts and UA information (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Please review: New drafts of Gateway techniques (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Gateway Techniques draft: responses to two editorial notes (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Proposed changes to Gateway Techniques draft (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon (Tuesday, 27 July)
• [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims (Thursday, 15 July)
• RE: Applicability of guidelines (Friday, 9 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Thursday, 8 July)
• InfoWalker "Broswer Companion" (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: AGENDA JULY 8th (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 07 July 2004 (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Monday, 5 July)
• RE: List Markup to Achieve Skip Repetitive Navigation Links Functionality (Friday, 2 July)
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Friday, 2 July)
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Friday, 2 July)
• Re: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Thursday, 1 July)
• RE: [#828] Definition of foreground and background (Thursday, 1 July)

Jon Hanna

• Re: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Tuesday, 7 September)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• More: WCAG 2 - 1.2 and Caption/Audio Description Policies (Thursday, 9 September)
• WCAG 2 - 1.2 and Caption/Audio Description Policies (Thursday, 9 September)

Ken Kipnes

• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 September 2004 (Tuesday, 21 September)

Kerstin Goldsmith

• Re: [Fwd: Re: Brainstorming about conformance profiles] (Friday, 10 September)
• [Fwd: Re: Brainstorming about conformance profiles] (Thursday, 9 September)
• Re: accessibility issue? (Wednesday, 18 August)
• accessibility issue? (Wednesday, 18 August)

Kynn Bartlett

• Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] (Tuesday, 24 August)

Lee Roberts

• RE: Proposed Revisions to Guideline 1.1 (Tuesday, 14 September)
• RE: Re: [#925] mandatory H1 (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Wednesday, 25 August)
• RE: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday (Tuesday, 3 August)
• RE: deaf-blind RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) (Saturday, 31 July)
• RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) (Friday, 30 July)
• RE: Flash captioning (was: RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?) (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: optgrou (was: Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques) (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 (Sunday, 25 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording (Wednesday, 7 July)

lguarino@adobe.com

• Re: Agenda 9-9-2004 (Wednesday, 8 September)
• Re: R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Regrets for Thursday, Sept 2 (Saturday, 28 August)

Li, Alex

• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 29 September 2004 (Wednesday, 29 September)

Lisa Seeman

• regrets (Tuesday, 14 September)
• RDF techniques (Tuesday, 14 September)
• RE: XAG (Sunday, 12 September)
• XAG (Sunday, 12 September)
• RE: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Monday, 30 August)
• RE: Guideline 2.4 L2, SC2 Skip nav link (Monday, 30 August)
• Using Bugziller (Sunday, 29 August)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Braille Formatting) (Sunday, 29 August)
• RE: [TECH] What is the WCAG stance on blinking? (Sunday, 29 August)
• RE: [techs] how to make a readable and clear page using CSS (Wednesday, 25 August)
• [tech] action item - titles in html techniques (Tuesday, 17 August)
• FW: RSVP: joint telecon August 2004 at 16:00 UTC (Wednesday, 11 August)
• late regrets Re: Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon (Saturday, 7 August)
• RE: [techs] scripts (Wednesday, 1 September)
• scripts both [tech] and not [tech] (to be or not to be...) (Friday, 16 July)
• Re: [techs] HTML (Thursday, 15 July)
• [techs] scripts (Thursday, 15 July)
• Proposals (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Fw: having slept on the conversation.... (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? - nit picking (Monday, 12 July)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• regrets for Aug 19 (Saturday, 14 August)
• Re: Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon (Wednesday, 4 August)
• Re: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Re: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Tuesday, 20 July)

Mark Birbeck

• ANN: formsPlayer combines XForms and the CSS3 Speech Module to produce multimodal forms (Saturday, 28 August)

Martin Duerst

• Re: [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content (Thursday, 9 September)

Martin Honnen

• Re: [#1059] Prohibit URLs with javascript protocol (Wednesday, 22 September)
• Re: OnActivate Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Re: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) (Tuesday, 6 July)

Matt May

• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Monday, 13 September)
• Scripting Techniques first draft (Monday, 13 September)
• Re: Agenda for 8/19/04 (Thursday, 19 August)
• regrets (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: [July F2F]] Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims (Thursday, 15 July)

Michael Cooper

• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 29 September 2004 (Tuesday, 28 September)
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 28 September)
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Monday, 27 September)
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Monday, 27 September)
• RE: [#1059] Prohibit URLs with javascript protocol (Monday, 27 September)
• [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• [#1071] Navigational supports with LINK (Tuesday, 21 September)
• [#1067] Require submit button for forms (Tuesday, 21 September)
• [#1066] Relative size in HTML (Tuesday, 21 September)
• [#1065] Provide a link to download an accessible plugin (Tuesday, 21 September)
• [#1064] Use markup instead of other formats (Tuesday, 21 September)
• [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 21 September)
• [#1062] Provide a site map (Tuesday, 21 September)
• [#1061] Create link text technique (Tuesday, 21 September)
• [#1059] Prohibit URLs with javascript protocol (Tuesday, 21 September)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 September 2004 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 15 September 2004 (Tuesday, 14 September)
• [techs] Notes from 08 September 2004 techniques teleconference (Wednesday, 8 September)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 September 2004 (Tuesday, 7 September)
• [techs] IRC log from 2004-09-01 techniques teleconference (Wednesday, 1 September)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 September 2004 (Tuesday, 31 August)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 25 August 2004 (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#925] mandatory H1 (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#922] contrast (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#918] NOSCRIPT (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#915] title for OBJECT (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#913] misuse of LI (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#912] label positioning (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#906, #907, #908, #909] Presentation elements (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#905] AREA targets (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#904, #916] Color in APPLET and OBJECT (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#903, #917] APPLET and OBJECT flicker (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#902] Document usable when APPLET disabled (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#901, #914] APPLET and OBJECT accessibility (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#900] Document readable without CSS support (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [#899] Separate links with printable characters (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 18 August 2004 (Tuesday, 17 August)
• [techs] IRC minutes of 04 August and 11 August techniques telecons (Wednesday, 11 August)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 11 August 2004 (Wednesday, 11 August)
• RE: questions re: task for 3.2? (Tuesday, 10 August)
• RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 04 August 2004 - addendum (Tuesday, 3 August)
• RE: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday (Tuesday, 3 August)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 04 August 2004 (Tuesday, 3 August)
• RE: contain edits to HTML techs: Fwd: Proposed changes to Gateway Techniques draft (Thursday, 29 July)
• Issues raised with HTML techniques (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Problems with guideline 4.1 (Wednesday, 28 July)
• RE: Issues with guideline 4.2 (Wednesday, 28 July)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 July 2004 (Tuesday, 27 July)
• New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• [techs] internal draft of HTML techniques (Wednesday, 21 July)
• [techs] Techniques Teleconference 21 July 2004 (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: having slept on the conversation.... (Tuesday, 13 July)
• [techs] CANCELLED techniques teleconference 14 July 2004 (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: List Markup to Achieve Skip Repetitive Navigation Links Funct ionality (Tuesday, 6 July)
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 07 July 2004 (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Tuesday, 6 July)

Michele Diodati

• Re: [#925] mandatory H1 (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: Re: [#925] mandatory H1 (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: [#925] mandatory H1 (Thursday, 26 August)

Mike Barta

• partial regrets: RE: Agenda for 8/12/04 (Thursday, 12 August)
• partial regrets. RE: Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 5 August)
• RE: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon (Thursday, 22 July)

Mirabella, Mathew J

• RE: Scripting Techniques first draft (Tuesday, 14 September)

Neil Soiffer

• Press Release: MathPlayer (Friday, 23 July)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: Best practices in online captioning (Thursday, 2 September)

Paul Bohman

• Re: Regrets for today (Thursday, 5 August)
• Re: optgroup (Thursday, 29 July)
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• Re: New internal draft of HTML techniques (Tuesday, 27 July)
• RE: Regrets 07/07/04 (Wednesday, 7 July)

Rhys Lewis

• RE: WCAG WG discussion of "authored unit" (Friday, 30 July)

Richard Ishida

• RE: [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content (without typos) (Thursday, 9 September)
• RE: 30 July 2004 WCAG 2.0 Working Drafts published (Tuesday, 3 August)
• [techs] use of http headers for language information (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: collapsible hierarchical menu navigation javascript (accessible) (Tuesday, 6 July)
• RE: WCAG 2: tying documents together (Monday, 5 July)

Richard Schwerdtfeger

• Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? (Monday, 12 July)
• RE: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place? (Friday, 9 July)

Roberto Castaldo

• Robertos' regrets: Sept. 30, 2004 Agenda (Thursday, 30 September)
• Regrets: Agenda - September 23, 2004 (Thursday, 23 September)
• Regrets: September 16, 2004 - Agenda (Thursday, 16 September)
• Regrets: Agenda 9-9-2004 (Thursday, 9 September)
• R: R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• R: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? (Monday, 30 August)
• Regrets for 24 august telcon (Thursday, 26 August)
• Regrets for August 6, 13 and 20 (Monday, 2 August)
• R: Agenda: 29 July 2004 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 29 July)
• Very late regrets: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon (Friday, 23 July)
• Regrets: July 1, 2004 Agenda (Thursday, 1 July)
• R: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? (Thursday, 1 July)
• R: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? (Thursday, 1 July)

Roberto Ellero

• Regrets - September 16, 2004 - Agenda (Thursday, 16 September)
• Re: Agenda: 26 August 2004 Telecon - regrets (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: Agenda for 8/19/04 - regrets (Thursday, 19 August)
• Regrets for today (Thursday, 12 August)
• Late regrets: Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon (Friday, 6 August)
• Late regrets: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon (Friday, 23 July)
• regrets: AGENDA JULY 8th (Thursday, 8 July)
• RE: July 1, 2004 Agenda (Thursday, 1 July)

Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)

• Regrets: Sept. 30, 2004 Agenda ************************************** (Thursday, 30 September)
• RE: [#1065] Provide a link to download an accessible plugin (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: NEW: Issue #1070 (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 21 September)
• RE: Regrets: September 16, 2004 - Agenda (Thursday, 16 September)
• RE: XAG (Sunday, 12 September)
• RE: Agenda 9-9-2004 (Wednesday, 8 September)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Thursday, 2 September)
• Regrets: Agenda: 2 September 2004 Telecon - regrets (Thursday, 2 September)
• RE: R: WCAG Logos are not WCAG compliant? (Monday, 30 August)
• RE: [TECH] What is the WCAG stance on blinking? (Friday, 27 August)
• Re: [#925] mandatory H1 (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: Comments on WCAG 2.0 Working Draft by WAI AUWG (Tuesday, 17 August)
• RE: [Techs] Short text alternatives for object element (Monday, 16 August)
• RE: [techlunch] Usability & Accessibility Working Group announces launch of new web site (Sunday, 15 August)
• RE: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday (Wednesday, 4 August)
• RE: Accessibility studies in the latest issue of First Monday (Tuesday, 3 August)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Thursday, 22 July)
• Re: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Wednesday, 21 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary? (Tuesday, 20 July)
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording (Wednesday, 7 July)

Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

• Re: Issue #1099 (where acronym are ambiguous...) (Wednesday, 29 September)
• Re: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Re: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Re: [#1063] APPLET alt text and alternative content (Tuesday, 28 September)
• Re: Issue #1054 (Thursday, 16 September)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Re: R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Re: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Tuesday, 7 September)
• Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Monday, 6 September)
• WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites (Monday, 30 August)
• Re: [#899] Separate links with printable characters (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Checklist for Success Criteria WCAG 2.0 (Sunday, 8 August)
• Regrets until 31th aug. 2004 (Thursday, 5 August)
• Re: Agenda: 29 July 2004 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 29 July)
• Regrets: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon (Thursday, 22 July)
• Regrets: AGENDA JULY 8th (Thursday, 8 July)
• German and WCAG 2.0 principles (Monday, 5 July)

Rodolfo Vargas

• Re: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Monday, 6 September)

Rotan Hanrahan

• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Tuesday, 7 September)
• RE: Microsoft patented keyboard-navigation? (Monday, 6 September)
• RE: WCAG WG discussion of "authored unit" (Thursday, 29 July)
• Invitation: W3C DIWG Workshop on Metadata for Content Adaptation (Wednesday, 28 July)

Sailesh Panchang

• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 29 September 2004 (Wednesday, 29 September)
• Re: [techs] Summary of techniques teleconference 22 September 2004 (Thursday, 23 September)
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 15 September 2004 (Tuesday, 14 September)
• Guideline 2.4 success criteria concerning title- proposal (Monday, 13 September)
• Title attribute on img element - not recommended? (Monday, 13 September)
• Regrets mostly for Thu Sept 9 (Thursday, 9 September)
• RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4- skip nav (Friday, 3 September)
• Guideline 2.4 L2, SC2 Skip nav link (Monday, 30 August)
• Guideline 2.4 and 1.3: HTML technique for structure in docs (Monday, 30 August)
• Guideline 2.4 and 1.3: HTML technique for structure in docs (Monday, 30 August)
• HTML technique: repeated for title? (Monday, 30 August)
• Guideline 2.4 success criteria concerning title (Monday, 30 August)
• Regrets: for Aug 18 and 19 (Monday, 16 August)
• Regrets: Aug 12 meet (Thursday, 12 August)
• Conformance level: statement needs change? (Monday, 9 August)
• Changes to guideline 2.4- proposal (Monday, 9 August)
• Access key background information (Thursday, 5 August)
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 28 July 2004 (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Regrets: Wednesday July 21 meet (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Instructions and cues in online forms: HTML+CSS solution (Tuesday, 20 July)
• Regrets:: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques Teleconference 07 July 2004 (Wednesday, 7 July)
• Re: List Markup to Achieve Skip Repetitive Navigation Links Funct ionality (Tuesday, 6 July)
• WCAG 2: tying documents together (Thursday, 1 July)

Shawn Lawton Henry

• Intro to WCAG 2.0 [was Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0]] (Friday, 3 September)
• Re: WCAG 2: tying documents together (Thursday, 1 July)

Tim Boland

• Fwd: QA Framework: New versions !!! (Wednesday, 1 September)
• questions re: task for 3.2? (Monday, 9 August)
• test case evaluation criteria? (Monday, 9 August)

Tom Croucher

• Regrets 07/07/04 (Wednesday, 7 July)

Tom Wright

• Re: Scripting Techniques first draft (Wednesday, 15 September)

Vicente Luque Centeno

• A question on bypassing a group of links (Sunday, 4 July)

WATANABE Takayuki

• Late Regrets: (Re: September 16, 2004 - Agenda (Friday, 17 September)
• Regrets Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 September 2004 (Wednesday, 8 September)
• Regrets for Re: Agenda: 2 September 2004 Telecon (Thursday, 2 September)
• Regrets Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 September 2004 (Wednesday, 1 September)
• Re: Regrets: Aug 12 meet (Thursday, 12 August)
• Regrets: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 11 August 2004 (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: Regrets for today (Thursday, 5 August)
• Re: Regrets: July 1, 2004 (Thursday, 1 July)

wendy

• Re: [Fwd: A Call to Reorganize WCAG 2.0] (Tuesday, 24 August)

Wendy A Chisholm

• New issues [week of 16 August] (Friday, 20 August)
• Fourth quarter milestones and timeline (Wednesday, 18 August)
• Re: Comments on WCAG 2.0 Working Draft by WAI AUWG (Tuesday, 17 August)
• 11 August 2004: Joint teleconference with PFWG, Semantic Web folks, and others (Thursday, 5 August)
• RE: Searching guidelines and techniques (Wednesday, 4 August)
• 30 July 2004 WCAG 2.0 Working Drafts published (Monday, 2 August)
• [partial update] gateway with John's edits, more links to html techs (Friday, 30 July)
• Re: Gateway Techniques draft: responses to two editorial notes (Thursday, 29 July)
• RE: Meaning and scope of "authored unit" (Thursday, 29 July)
• Agenda: 29 July 2004 WCAG WG telecon (Wednesday, 28 July)
• Please review: New drafts of Gateway techniques (Wednesday, 28 July)
• [css-techs] new draft for discussion and publication (Tuesday, 27 July)
• [css techs] new draft for discussion, list of to dos (Wednesday, 21 July)
• [css techs] issues list udpdate (Tuesday, 20 July)

Wendy Chisholm

• Notes from discussion about programmatic object, non-text content (Thursday, 30 September)
• Regrets - Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 September 2004 (Tuesday, 21 September)
• 21 issues to close (Thursday, 16 September)
• Re: [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content (Thursday, 16 September)
• Re: Searching the list archives (Wednesday, 15 September)
• Registration open, logistics page up (Monday, 13 September)
• October face-to-face: 19-22 October in Dublin, Ireland (Friday, 10 September)
• Re: Guideline 2.4 success criteria concerning title (Thursday, 9 September)
• [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content (without typos) (Wednesday, 8 September)
• [Issue 673] Proposed definitions for text, Unicode, non-text content (Wednesday, 8 September)
• 3 September 2004 internal Working Drafts published (Friday, 3 September)
• [1.2] issue summary and proposal (Thursday, 2 September)
• Agenda: 2 September 2004 Telecon (Wednesday, 1 September)
• Notes from brainstorming session (Tuesday, 31 August)
• Update: Next face-to-face meeting (Saturday, 28 August)
• Issues update [week of 23 August 2004] (Saturday, 28 August)
• Monday, 30 August brainstorm about conformance profiles (Saturday, 28 August)
• Agenda: 26 August 2004 Telecon (Wednesday, 25 August)

Yvette P. Hoitink

• Regrets (RE: Agenda - September 23, 2004 ****** ) (Wednesday, 22 September)
• RE: Scripting Techniques first draft (Monday, 13 September)
• Regrets (RE: Agenda 9-9-2004) (Wednesday, 8 September)
• Possible regrets for September 2 (Wednesday, 1 September)
• [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4 (Monday, 30 August)
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text (Friday, 27 August)
• Proposal: Authoring tools (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: [TECH] Possible CSS Technique for image-text (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: Re: [#925] mandatory H1 (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: [#925] mandatory H1 (Wednesday, 25 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content' (Thursday, 19 August)
• RE: Agenda for 8/19/04 - regrets (Wednesday, 18 August)
• Regrets (RE: Agenda: Aug 5 2004 WCAG WG telecon ) (Thursday, 5 August)
• RE: Proposal for this fridays draft linking from Guidelines to techniques (Friday, 23 July)
• RE: having slept on the conversation.... (Tuesday, 13 July)
• Suggestion for image of overview of documents (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)
• [3.1][2.4] Informative page titles: suggested solution (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Linear reading order (Wednesday, 7 July)
• RE: Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. (action item) (Monday, 5 July)
• RE: Clear link text - my thoughts (Friday, 2 July)
• Clear link text - my thoughts (Thursday, 1 July)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 September 2004 19:55:23 UTC