- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:23:55 +0200 (MEST)
- To: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> > "In general, content is considered complex if it requires much > > effort and trouble to be analyzed or understood. In particular, > > this could mean that the displayed information is too capacious, > > is ordered too dense, [...] > > I think this formulation, and its subsequent ineffectual rewrites > are pretty awful. Not only does it embody the same problem it's > trying to solve, it's way too vague [...] Thank you, Joe, though I need other feedback to improve my work (I used the definition of 'complex' to approach a definition of 'complex content', ignoring the missing definition of 'content' itself). Nonetheless, I claim you cannot be precise in this case (like the discussion only seems to confirm). Jens. -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect (IxD) http://meiert.com/
Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 17:24:26 UTC