W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording

From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 14:54:51 -0500
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF84C8F565.68738BA2-ON86256ECB.006C92A4-86256ECB.006D6470@us.ibm.com>





We need to distinguish between 2.1 and 4.2. 4.2 says "Ensure that user
interfaces are accessible or provide an accessible alternative" and has as
a Level 1 success criteria

"The application should support keyboard access per UAAG 1.0 checkpoints
1.1 and 6.7."

As an aside, the 4.2 success criteria should be changed from "application"
to "user interface" to match the guideline. If it then reads,

"The user interface should support keyboard access per UAAG 1.0 checkpoints
1.1 and 6.7"

then what is not covered that causes us to need guideline 3.1?

Andi
andisnow@us.ibm.com
IBM Accessibility Center
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 15:59:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:58 UTC