- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:57:33 +1000
- To: Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Jason White writes: > > "Every page or resource that can be accessed independently has an > informative title". > > If we adopted Yvette's wording we would need to make it very clear in > the guidelines that if the concept of a "page" doesn't apply to the > content then this success criterion is not applicable, and hence > passes. In fact, all success criteria which do not apply to the > content are deemed to be satisfied by default, as we have discussed in > relation to conformance. Since this does not apply to all types of Web content as I argued earlier, does that mean it has to be at level 3? I thought one of our principles was that anything which couldn't reasonably be applied to all, or most types of content had to move to level 3. Of course we can alter that principle if we want to, but it would need to be done explicitly and deliberately. I am also not sure whether "informative" is testable in difficult cases.
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 01:57:52 UTC