W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Access Key alternative -in the wrong place?

From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:00:10 -0500
To: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Cc: Becky Gibson <gibsonb@us.ibm.com>, Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, Liddy Nevile <liddy.nevile@motile.net>, Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf-request@w3.org, wai-gl@w3c.org
Message-ID: <OFB3249B2A.1D257AF2-ON86256ECF.006DA759-86256ECF.006DE133@us.ibm.com>


Browsers need to map RDF to an API to describe how to interact with an
object. This requires a good RDF parser.

Furthermore, it is becoming less likely that transcoding will be done in
the middleware to process it since more often than not the UI will be
constructed on the client.

Rich Schwerdtfeger
STSM, Software Group Accessibility Strategist/Master Inventor
Emerging Internet Technologies
Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review  Board
schwer@us.ibm.com, Phone: 512-838-4593,T/L: 678-4593

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.",

             Jim Ley                                                       
             m>                                                         To 
             Sent by:                  Richard                             
             w3c-wai-pf-reques         Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS      
             t@w3.org                                                   cc 
                                       Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>,    
                                       Becky Gibson/Westford/IBM@Iris, Jon 
             07/10/2004 06:17          Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, Liddy 
             AM                        Nevile <liddy.nevile@motile.net>,   
                                       w3c-wai-pf@w3.org, wai-gl@w3c.org   
                                       Re: Access Key alternative -in the  
                                       wrong place?                        

Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
>Another concern that is growing for me is RDF. One of the problems we
>are faced with on RDF is that NO browser supports it.

I'm not exactly sure how you suggest browsers should or need to
support RDF for this, it's not being served up to a user as bare RDF,
but simply using RDF to provide useful additional metadata.

The metadata need not be consumed by mainstream browsers, indeed I'm
not sure what usefulness mozilla would have in doing so to the
majority of its users, however it's easy to extend the browser with
plugins to provide the functionality in an AT sense.

Or do you propose inventing a new metadata format?


(image/gif attachment: graycol.gif)

(image/gif attachment: pic20008.gif)

(image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif)

Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 16:36:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:50 UTC