W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web sites

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:07:52 +0200
Message-ID: <014401c494e4$19244c00$0200a8c0@iwars>
To: <lguarino@adobe.com>, "Roberto Castaldo" <r.castaldo@iol.it>
Cc: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <ij@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <jbrewer@w3.org>


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <lguarino@adobe.com>
To: "Roberto Castaldo" <r.castaldo@iol.it>
Cc: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>; "'Gregg
Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>; "'Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)'"
<rscano@iwa-italy.org>; <ij@w3.org>; <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>;
<jbrewer@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: R: WCAG 1.0 - checkpoint 11.4, policy and parallel web
sites


Are we really proposing modifications to WCAG 1.0 at this
point? Forbidding other solutions seems like we are narrowing
the original guideline.

Roberto Scano:
What I propose is to make "clear" the note for "after the best
efforts...".
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2004 14:08:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:58 UTC