W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon

From: Mike Barta <mikba@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:52:01 -0700
Message-ID: <7DF35A0B5F67E84B9095C21C8A97641802A37867@RED-MSG-33.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Partial regrets; I'll be a bit late to call in today.


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 3:53 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Agenda items for July 20, 2004 telecon

Hi everyone. 

Time: 20:00 UTC
(4 PM US Eastern, 10 PM France, 8 AM Friday Eastern Australia)
Number:  +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224 irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag

Our agenda items are below.
PLEASE READ and think about these items in advance so we can knock em off. 

Our focus for this week is 'whatever we need before next public release"

Item 0: Confirmation of our decisions at the F2F

From Johns Post  (there have been some posts after John post on this which should be read as well)

1. Any conformance with WCAG 2.0 requires that all Level 1 success criteria for all guidelines be met.

2. WCAG 2.0 conformance at level A means that all Level 1 success criteria for all guidelines are met. 

3. WCAG 2.0 conformance at Level AA means that all Level 1 and all Level 2 success criteria for all guidelines are met

4. WCAG 2.0 conformance at Level AAA means that all Level 1, Level2, and Level 3 success criteria for all guidelines are met

Conformance claims
1. All conformance claims must include at least the following information: 

a. The version of the guidelines to which the conformance claim is made.

b. The URI of the authored unit for which the claim is being made.

(Editor's note: the phrase "authored unit" should be linked to a glossary definition based on the definition of this term in the Device Independence Working Group's Glossary of Terms at http://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/) .

c. The level of conformance being claimed. 

2. The conformance level for an authored unit that contains other authored units is equal to the lowest conformance level claimed for the authored unit and any of the units it contains.

Editor's Note #1: A question has been raised as to whether the information required in items 1(a)-1(c) above should all be transmitted in the HTTP header or in some other way.

Editor's Note #2: We are currently looking at how to handle unknown or community-contributed, authored units that are created using an aggregator supplied tool. If the aggregator-supplied tool conforms to

ATAG, can ATAG conformance be used to imply that the aggregated content conforms to WCAG?



Item 1: 
Issue #322 - Requirement for full text script of all movies?
Goal: Incorporate a resolution to this issue into the revisions from the June 24, 2004 telecon. 
Latest Proposal: 
Issue Description:

Item 2:
Proposed wording on Conformance and Conformance Claims
Goal: review list discussion and determine whether issues remain or additional clarifications are needed for the next draft.
List discussion:

Item 3:
Issue #832 Clear link text, etc. 
Goal: Decide whether the proposal resulting from the July 1, 2004 telecon should be included in the next draft. If yes, at which level? 
Proposal and list discussion:

Item 4:
Linking to techniques from guidelines
Goal: For our next public draft, we'd like to begin linking to the techniques drafts. A proposal for how this could be done is available <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2004/04/links-from-wcag.html#Option5> and we'd like to settle on an approach for including these links as the gateway and supporting techniques drafts become available. 
Received on Thursday, 22 July 2004 15:52:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:50 UTC