W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2004

21 issues to close

From: Wendy Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:52:27 -0400
Message-ID: <4149D2DB.4030902@w3.org>
To: wai-gl <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

If there are no objections, the following 21 issues related to Guideline 
2.4 will be closed on 23 September.

 "SUBS" means that the issue was subsumed because text that caused the 
issue is no longer present in the WCAG 2.0 document. 
"DUPL" means that the issue is a duplicate of another issue. 
"NONE" means that a proposal was incorporated into a draft.

211       SUBS       Skip navigation - technique or success criteria?
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=211
245     SUBS     ambiguity of "long document" and "major section"
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=245
376     DECL     user control over presentation of structure
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=376
415     SUBS     Checkpoint text for navigation-mechanisms difficult to 
in...
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=415
448     SUBS     add definition for "visual appearance"
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=448
449     SUBS     add definition for "auditory characteristic"
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=449
450     SUBS     example 2 needs clarification
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=450
453     SUBS     move additional notes to techniques
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=453
468     DUPL     navigation-mechanism should be required
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=468
589     SUBS     checkpoint is too vague and not a WCAG issue
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=589
632     SUBS     Proposed wording for Guideline 2.4
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=632
634     NONE     Proposed wording for Guideline 2.4, [level 2] SC 2
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=634
635     NONE     Proposed wording for [level 3, item 1] Guideline 2.4
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=635
636     NONE     Proposed level 3, item 2 for 2.4
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=636
638     NONE     Proposed level 3, item 4 for 2.4
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=638
690     SUBS     change "added" to "included" in guideline text
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=690
692     SUBS     structural markup and display on different devices
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=692
761     SUBS     Added comment from list: Visual layout is used to group 
r...
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=761
883     DUPL     This guideline is about "usability", not "accessibility"
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=883
945     SUBS     Please clarify need to "look different"
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=945
947     DUPL     Is logical tab order testable?
http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=947

-- 
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
http://www.w3.org/WAI/
/--
Received on Thursday, 16 September 2004 17:53:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:58 UTC