W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content'

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:23:27 -0500
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <auto-000063837117@spamarrest.com>


I ask because I don't think we want to in any way say that complex content
should not be posted to the Web.  

So I think we need to remove the word content (or at least not comment about
not posting complex content) 
- and talk about presenting content in complex ways 
- or complex presentations 
- or something along those lines. 
 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Jens Meiert
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:00 AM
To: Gregg Vanderheiden
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: [wcag2] Definition of 'complex content'


> I wonder if we are talking about complex content or complex
> presentation.

Well, indeed, but the definition of 'content' (which is still missing) has
to clarify this, I guess.

Not binding (since spontaneously) I'd refer to 'content' as almost
everything which does not comply with navigation or supplementary data (like
e.g. info boxes, usually used in some kind of right margin). And in my
opinion, this also includes presentational aspects.


 Jens.


-- 
Jens Meiert
Interface Architect (IxD)

http://meiert.com/
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 15:23:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:58 UTC