W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from April to June 2005 by thread

06/30 call Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG) (Thursday, 30 June)
Updated mapping of WCAG 1.0 checkpoints to WCAG 2.0 success criteria Andi Snow-Weaver (Thursday, 30 June)
Regrets: Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Thursday, 30 June)
Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 27 June)
- Re: Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= lguarino@adobe.com (Thursday, 30 June)
- Probable regrets (RE: Agenda 6/30/05 =======================) Yvette Hoitink (Thursday, 30 June)
- Re: Agenda 6/30/05 - partial regrets Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Thursday, 30 June)
- Start time of WCAG telecon (was:Re: Agenda 6/30/05) Christophe Strobbe (Thursday, 30 June)
  - Re: Start time of WCAG telecon (was:Re: Agenda 6/30/05) Wendy Chisholm (Thursday, 30 June)
- Re: Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. - (Thursday, 30 June)
  - Re: Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= WATANABE Takayuki (Thursday, 30 June)
- Re: Agenda 6/30/05 ======================= Tim Boland (Thursday, 30 June)
- regrets, Agenda 6/30/05 Roberto Ellero (Thursday, 30 June)
  - RE: regrets, Agenda 6/30/05 Luca Mascaro (Thursday, 30 June)
- Regrets: Agenda 6/30/05 Roberto Castaldo (Thursday, 30 June)
GL 1.3 issue summary against June 30 draft Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Thursday, 30 June)
GL 2.2 issue summary (close/clarify/not addressed) Christophe Strobbe (Thursday, 30 June)
[2.4] Issue summary Yvette Hoitink (Thursday, 30 June)
Fax Message Wendy (Wednesday, 29 June)
Fwd: [Proposed Recommendation] QA Specification Guidelines Tim Boland (Wednesday, 29 June)
Web Standards Project Accessibility Task Force Joe Clark (Sunday, 26 June)
GL 4.2 Issues Summary Loretta Guarino Reid (Friday, 24 June)
[minutes] 23 june 2005 telecon Wendy A Chisholm (Thursday, 23 June)
Proposed ednote to clarify captions and transcript Michael Cooper (Thursday, 23 June)
- RE: Proposed ednote to clarify captions and transcript Yvette Hoitink (Friday, 24 June)
Protected message Wendy (Thursday, 23 June)
- RE: Protected message Wendy (Friday, 10 June)
Re: Need 1.1 L1 SC basic requirement to provide text alternative Wendy A Chisholm (Thursday, 23 June)
Need 1.1 L1 SC basic requirement to provide text alternative Michael Cooper (Thursday, 23 June)
Reminder: Call starts early today John M Slatin (Thursday, 23 June)
Parsing and extracting information (valid or not) Johannes Koch (Thursday, 23 June)
Validation: what criteria in L1, L2 or L3?... Maurizio Boscarol (Thursday, 23 June)
- Re: Validation: what criteria in L1, L2 or L3?... Tina Holmboe (Thursday, 23 June)
  - Re: Validation: what criteria in L1, L2 or L3?... Maurizio Boscarol (Thursday, 23 June)
regrets for today's call (06/23) Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG) (Thursday, 23 June)
- RE: regrets for today's call (06/23) Luca Mascaro (Thursday, 23 June)
checklist prototype Ben Caldwell (Thursday, 23 June)
- Re: checklist prototype boland@nist.gov (Thursday, 23 June)
  - Re: checklist prototype Gez Lemon (Thursday, 23 June)
    - Re: checklist prototype info@lucamascaro.info (Thursday, 23 June)
Reasons to move validity back to P1 Gez Lemon (Wednesday, 22 June)
- Validity and Well-formedness Jens Meiert (Thursday, 23 June)
Summing up the debate about validity at Priority 1 or 2 Joe Clark (Wednesday, 22 June)
- FW: Summing up the debate about validity at Priority 1 or 2 Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 22 June)
- RE: Summing up the debate about validity at Priority 1 or 2 Bailey, Bruce (Thursday, 23 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Wednesday, 22 June)
- RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Neil Whiteley (Wednesday, 22 June)
  - XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) David Dorward (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - RE: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) Neil Whiteley (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) Gez Lemon (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) David Dorward (Thursday, 23 June)
    - Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) Gez Lemon (Thursday, 23 June)
    - Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?) David Dorward (Thursday, 23 June)
- RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Guideline 1.3 SC Ben Caldwell (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Tina Holmboe (Wednesday, 22 June)
- Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Wednesday, 22 June)
  - RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Neil Whiteley (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Mike Barta (Wednesday, 22 June)
content arranged in a sequence that affects meaning Ben Caldwell (Wednesday, 22 June)
- RE: content arranged in a sequence that affects meaning John M Slatin (Wednesday, 22 June)
[techs] examples for techniques requirements document Wendy A Chisholm (Wednesday, 22 June)
- Re: [techs] examples for techniques requirements document Joe Clark (Wednesday, 22 June)
testing (no need to respond, still testing archives) Wendy A Chisholm (Wednesday, 22 June)
testing (no need to respond, testing archives) Wendy A Chisholm (Wednesday, 22 June)
Not over til its over - hang in there whatever your view(s). Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 22 June)
a note on voluntary standards and policy related standards Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 22 June)
Introduction: Updated version John M Slatin (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Wednesday, 22 June)
- Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Jason White (Wednesday, 22 June)
  - RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Neil Whiteley (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Jason White (Thursday, 23 June)
Multiple definitions for "baseline" Tim Boland (Wednesday, 22 June)
NEW: Issue #1534 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 22 June)
Agenda: 23 June Telecon John M Slatin (Wednesday, 22 June)
- Regrets (RE: Agenda: 23 June Telecon) Yvette Hoitink (Wednesday, 22 June)
  - Re: Regrets (RE: Agenda: 23 June Telecon) WATANABE Takayuki (Thursday, 23 June)
    - Regrets: Agenda: 23 June Telecon Roberto Castaldo (Thursday, 23 June)
- Re: Agenda: 23 June Telecon lguarino@adobe.com (Wednesday, 22 June)
- Re: Agenda: 23 June Telecon - partial regrets Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Thursday, 23 June)
♦Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Sailesh Panchang (Wednesday, 22 June)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 June 2005 Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 21 June)
test David MacDonald (Tuesday, 21 June)
- RE: test Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Tina Holmboe (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Tuesday, 21 June)
- Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Tuesday, 21 June)
  - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Lisa Seeman (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Lisa Seeman (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - Sorry about double posting Lisa Seeman (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? Lisa Seeman (Wednesday, 22 June)
- Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Gez Lemon (Tuesday, 21 June)
- Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Jens Meiert (Tuesday, 21 June)
  - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? David Dorward (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? Jens Meiert (Tuesday, 21 June)
- Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Jason White (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Tina Holmboe (Tuesday, 21 June)
RE: Fwd: Re: [TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information (fwd) John M Slatin (Monday, 20 June)
FW: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) John M Slatin (Monday, 20 June)
RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] Mike Barta (Monday, 20 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) John M Slatin (Monday, 20 June)
- RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Monday, 20 June)
- RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Joe Clark (Monday, 20 June)
  - RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) John M Slatin (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Gez Lemon (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Ineke van der Maat (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) David Dorward (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Ineke van der Maat (Monday, 20 June)
    - perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! David MacDonald (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! Gez Lemon (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! Neil Whiteley (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! John M Slatin (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! Gez Lemon (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! John M Slatin (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! Tina Holmboe (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely! Ineke van der Maat (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - remove validity completely? David MacDonald (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - RE: remove validity completely? Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 22 June)
    - Re: remove validity completely? Joe Clark (Wednesday, 22 June)
  - RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) John M Slatin (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Ineke van der Maat (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Maurizio Boscarol (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Gez Lemon (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Maurizio Boscarol (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Gez Lemon (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Maurizio Boscarol (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Gez Lemon (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Maurizio Boscarol (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Jason White (Monday, 27 June)
- Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Isofarro (Monday, 20 June)
- RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) John M Slatin (Monday, 20 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? Bailey, Bruce (Monday, 20 June)
- RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? Bailey, Bruce (Monday, 20 June)
Another resource re: testability of WCAG2.0 guidelines and success criteria Tim Boland (Monday, 20 June)
- RE: Another resource re: testability of WCAG2.0 guidelines and success criteria John M Slatin (Monday, 20 June)
Fwd: Re: [TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information (fwd) Joe Clark (Monday, 20 June)
- Re: Fwd: Re: [TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information (fwd) Isofarro (Monday, 20 June)
Should validity be P1 or P2? (was Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers) Bailey, Bruce (Monday, 20 June)
Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Bailey, Bruce (Monday, 20 June)
- Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? David Dorward (Monday, 20 June)
  - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? Bailey, Bruce (Sunday, 26 June)
- Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Matt May (Monday, 20 June)
  - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Joe Clark (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Matt May (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Christophe Strobbe (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Joe Clark (Tuesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Christophe Strobbe (Thursday, 23 June)
    - R: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Roberto Castaldo (Thursday, 23 June)
    - Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Joe Clark (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] Christophe Strobbe (Monday, 20 June)
- Re: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Monday, 20 June)
  - HTML/XHTML, mime-types, Strict & Transitional [was Re: Semantics] David Dorward (Monday, 20 June)
    - RE: HTML/XHTML, mime-types, Strict & Transitional [was Re: Semantics] Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: HTML/XHTML, mime-types, Strict & Transitional [was Re: Semantics] David Dorward (Monday, 20 June)
Draft Introduction to WCAG 2.0 John M Slatin (Monday, 20 June)
- RE: Draft Introduction to WCAG 2.0 Yvette Hoitink (Monday, 20 June)
  - RE: Draft Introduction to WCAG 2.0 Tim Boland (Monday, 20 June)
《EC商务周刊-资讯版》(2005年第22期总第54期) www.ec.com.cn (Friday, 17 June)
Re : Influence of valid code (generically) Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG) (Friday, 17 June)
Done - Revisited Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 17 June)
FW: 4.2 notes/proposals Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 16 June)
Over Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 16 June)
2.3 Guideline revisions proposal Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 16 June)
2 levels or 3 Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 16 June)
- Re: 2 levels or 3 Matt May (Friday, 17 June)
Over Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 16 June)
F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates Ben Caldwell (Thursday, 16 June)
- RE: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Thursday, 16 June)
  - RE: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates Yvette Hoitink (Friday, 17 June)
    - Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates Gez Lemon (Friday, 17 June)
    - Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates) Christophe Strobbe (Friday, 17 June)
    - Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] Joe Clark (Friday, 17 June)
    - RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] Gregg Vanderheiden (Saturday, 18 June)
    - RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] Joe Clark (Sunday, 19 June)
    - RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] Mike Barta (Monday, 20 June)
    - RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)] Joe Clark (Monday, 20 June)
    - Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates) Gez Lemon (Friday, 17 June)
[TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Wednesday, 15 June)
About tests 37-41 (headers) Vicente Luque Centeno (Wednesday, 15 June)
- Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Joe Clark (Wednesday, 15 June)
  - Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Vicente Luque Centeno (Thursday, 16 June)
- Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 15 June)
  - Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Chris Ridpath (Wednesday, 15 June)
    - Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Vicente Luque Centeno (Thursday, 16 June)
    - RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) David MacDonald (Saturday, 18 June)
    - Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Gez Lemon (Saturday, 18 June)
  - Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Vicente Luque Centeno (Thursday, 16 June)
About test 13 (client side image-maps) Vicente Luque Centeno (Wednesday, 15 June)
WCAG formalization (rewriting WCAG HTML techniques as automatable rules) Vicente Luque Centeno (Wednesday, 15 June)
Validation as test for basic accessibility Bailey, Bruce (Wednesday, 15 June)
- Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility Vicente Luque Centeno (Wednesday, 15 June)
- Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility Matt May (Wednesday, 15 June)
- RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility Bailey, Bruce (Thursday, 16 June)
GL 2.2: updated proposals Christophe Strobbe (Wednesday, 15 June)
CLOSED: Issue #777 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 15 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1259 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 15 June)
CLOSED: Issue #659 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 15 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1422 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 15 June)
1.4 background sound David MacDonald (Tuesday, 14 June)
Changes.. Wendy (Tuesday, 14 June)

RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Tuesday, 14 June)
- Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Joe Clark (Tuesday, 14 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Jens Meiert (Tuesday, 14 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Matt May (Tuesday, 14 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Joe Clark (Thursday, 16 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Matt May (Friday, 17 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Joe Clark (Friday, 17 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Matt May (Friday, 17 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Tim Boland (Monday, 20 June)
  - Definition of "testable" (was: Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days) Joe Clark (Monday, 20 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Gez Lemon (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 15 June)
- Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Wendy Chisholm (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 15 June)
- Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Matt May (Wednesday, 15 June)
  - RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days David MacDonald (Wednesday, 15 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Isofarro (Friday, 17 June)
RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Mike Barta (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 15 June)
- Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Matt May (Wednesday, 15 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Ineke van der Maat (Wednesday, 15 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Matt May (Wednesday, 15 June)
  - Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days kerstin (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 15 June)
- Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days kerstin (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Thursday, 16 June)

YOUR PASSWORD HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY UPDATED webmaster@w3.org (Tuesday, 14 June)

RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC (Tuesday, 14 June)
RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers Bailey, Bruce (Tuesday, 14 June)
RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Tuesday, 14 June)
- RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers Luca Mascaro (Thursday, 16 June)
  - Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Castaldo (Thursday, 16 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Matt May (Friday, 17 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Castaldo (Friday, 17 June)
  - RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Yvette Hoitink (Friday, 17 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Matt May (Friday, 17 June)
  - RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Luca Mascaro (Saturday, 18 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Maurizio Boscarol (Saturday, 18 June)
  - R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Castaldo (Sunday, 19 June)
  - Re: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Maurizio Boscarol (Monday, 20 June)
  - R: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Castaldo (Monday, 20 June)
  - Re: R: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Maurizio Boscarol (Monday, 20 June)
  - R: R: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Castaldo (Tuesday, 21 June)
  - Re: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Monday, 20 June)
  - Re: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Maurizio Boscarol (Monday, 20 June)
  - R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Castaldo (Sunday, 19 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Isofarro (Friday, 17 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Matt May (Friday, 17 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Friday, 17 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Friday, 17 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Matt May (Friday, 17 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Saturday, 18 June)
  - RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Luca Mascaro (Saturday, 18 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Tina Holmboe (Saturday, 18 June)
  - RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Bailey, Bruce (Saturday, 18 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Tina Holmboe (Saturday, 18 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Saturday, 18 June)
  - Why is important require well-formed, validity and richness in XHTML by examples Luca Mascaro (Saturday, 18 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Matt May (Saturday, 18 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Saturday, 18 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Tina Holmboe (Saturday, 18 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Maurizio Boscarol (Sunday, 19 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Sunday, 19 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Tina Holmboe (Monday, 20 June)
  - Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers Maurizio Boscarol (Monday, 20 June)
RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC (Wednesday, 15 June)
RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 15 June)

Proposals from June 13 Face to Face Ben Caldwell (Monday, 13 June)
- Re: Proposals from June 13 Face to Face Tim Boland (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers Joe Clark (Monday, 13 June)
- Re: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers Jason White (Tuesday, 14 June)
  - R: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG (Tuesday, 14 June)
    - Re: R: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers info@lucamascaro.info (Tuesday, 14 June)
Definition of "semantics" Joe Clark (Sunday, 12 June)
- Re: Definition of "semantics" Jens Meiert (Sunday, 12 June)
  - Re: Definition of "semantics" Jason White (Monday, 13 June)
  - Re: Definition of "semantics" Joe Clark (Monday, 13 June)
    - Re: Definition of "semantics" Jens Meiert (Monday, 13 June)
    - Re: Definition of "semantics" Joe Clark (Monday, 13 June)
    - Re: Definition of "semantics" Jens Meiert (Monday, 13 June)
NEW: Issue #1533 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Saturday, 11 June)
Updated Survey for 4.1 Ben Caldwell (Friday, 10 June)
3.2 Proposal version 2 Li, Alex (Friday, 10 June)
NEW: Issue #1531 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Friday, 10 June)
NEW: Issue #1530 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Friday, 10 June)
Updated survey for Guideline 2.5 Wendy Chisholm (Friday, 10 June)
Updated survey for guideline 3.1 Wendy Chisholm (Friday, 10 June)
Input for F2F on Guide and general techniques David MacDonald (Thursday, 9 June)
Updated: 9 June 2005 Agenda Wendy Chisholm (Wednesday, 8 June)
Issue summary for the guidelines document in general Wendy Chisholm (Wednesday, 8 June)
9 June 2005 Agenda [================================= Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 8 June)
- Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda [================================= Roberto Castaldo (Friday, 10 June)
  - Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda (for Luca Mascaro) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG (Thursday, 9 June)
  - Late Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda [================================= Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. - (Friday, 10 June)
    - Re: Late Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda [================================= WATANABE Takayuki (Friday, 10 June)
Conformance Issues Andi Snow-Weaver (Wednesday, 8 June)
GL 2.5 Remaining 3 issues Andi Snow-Weaver (Wednesday, 8 June)
Issue Summary 1.4 Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 8 June)
- Re: Issue Summary 1.4 Tim Boland (Wednesday, 8 June)
CLOSED: Issue #478 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 8 June)
CLOSED: Issue #503 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 8 June)
Updated proposal for Guideline 1.1 Wendy Chisholm (Wednesday, 8 June)
NEW: Issue #1528 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 8 June)
NEW: Issue #1529 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 8 June)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 June 2005 Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 7 June)
- RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 June 2005 John M Slatin (Tuesday, 7 June)
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 June 2005 boland@nist.gov (Wednesday, 8 June)
* Can we Start 1 hour early for Thursday call???? Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 7 June)
[2.1] Guideline summary and new proposal Yvette Hoitink (Tuesday, 7 June)
3.1: Action item re foreign passages John M Slatin (Tuesday, 7 June)
- Re: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages Tim Boland (Tuesday, 7 June)
- RE: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages John M Slatin (Tuesday, 7 June)
- Re: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages Matt May (Tuesday, 7 June)
- RE: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages Li, Alex (Wednesday, 8 June)
Agenda for Techniques portion of Face to Face, 15 - 16 June 2005 Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 7 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1355 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Tuesday, 7 June)
3.1: Another update John M Slatin (Tuesday, 7 June)
[TECHS] Review of SC with respect to Scripting and baseline issues. Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Monday, 6 June)
GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) Christophe Strobbe (Sunday, 5 June)
- RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) Gregg Vanderheiden (Sunday, 5 June)
  - RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) Joe Clark (Sunday, 5 June)
    - RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) Gregg Vanderheiden (Sunday, 5 June)
    - RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) Joe Clark (Monday, 6 June)
    - RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 6 June)
    - Re: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) Ineke van der Maat (Monday, 6 June)
    - Level 3 Matt May (Monday, 6 June)
    - RE: Level 3 Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 6 June)
    - RE: Level 3 Joe Clark (Saturday, 11 June)
    - Re: Level 3 Jason White (Monday, 13 June)
    - Re: Level 3 Tim Boland (Tuesday, 14 June)
- RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy) John M Slatin (Monday, 6 June)
CLOSED: Issue #965 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Saturday, 4 June)
Reminder: straw poll for 2.4 Yvette Hoitink (Friday, 3 June)
Agenda: 13-16 June meeting in Brussels John M Slatin (Friday, 3 June)
[techs] [Fwd: ACCESSKEY heats up] Wendy Chisholm (Friday, 3 June)
[minutes] 2 June 2005 telecon Wendy Chisholm (Thursday, 2 June)
[1.3] Alternative proposal for guideline text Yvette Hoitink (Thursday, 2 June)
regrets for today's call Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG) (Thursday, 2 June)
Provide Feedback on Straw poll forms Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 2 June)
Text being imperceptible (allegedly) Joe Clark (Wednesday, 1 June)
- RE: Text being imperceptible (allegedly) John M Slatin (Wednesday, 1 June)
- RE: Text being imperceptible (allegedly) boland@nist.gov (Thursday, 2 June)
Agenda Update: 2 June 2005 John M Slatin (Wednesday, 1 June)
- Re: Agenda Update: 2 June 2005 boland@nist.gov (Thursday, 2 June)
[techs] Minutes for 01 June Techniques teleconference Michael Cooper (Wednesday, 1 June)
Agenda: 2 June 2005 John M Slatin (Wednesday, 1 June)
- Regrets: Agenda: 2 June 2005 Roberto Castaldo (Friday, 3 June)
  - Regrets: Agenda: 2 June 2005 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. - (Thursday, 2 June)
June 1 Draft Ben Caldwell (Wednesday, 1 June)
3.1: Another update to the proposal John M Slatin (Wednesday, 1 June)
- Re: Another update to the proposal Ineke van der Maat (Wednesday, 1 June)
  - Freedom of speech (Was RE: Another update to the proposal) Yvette Hoitink (Wednesday, 1 June)
    - Re: Freedom of speech (Was RE: Another update to the proposal) Avi Arditti (Wednesday, 1 June)
- Re: 3.1: Another update to the proposal Lisa Seeman (Thursday, 2 June)
CLOSED: Issue #802 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 1 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1501 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 1 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1225 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 1 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1500 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 1 June)
regrets, June 2 lguarino@adobe.com (Wednesday, 1 June)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 June 2005 Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 31 May)
- Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 June 2005 boland@nist.gov (Wednesday, 1 June)
Updated proposal for GL 1.3 L1 SC2 Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Tuesday, 31 May)
- Re: Updated proposal for GL 1.3 L1 SC2 Jason White (Wednesday, 1 June)
  - Re: Updated proposal for GL 1.3 L1 SC2 Joe Clark (Wednesday, 1 June)
[2.4] New proposal for guideline 2.4 Yvette Hoitink (Tuesday, 31 May)
CLOSED: Issue #1457 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Saturday, 28 May)
points to Ponder Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 27 May)
Usability issues in Ajax/Web applications (with implications for accessibility) Joe Clark (Friday, 27 May)
- RE: Usability issues in Ajax/Web applications (with implications for accessibility) Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 27 May)
- Re: Usability issues in Ajax/Web applications (with implications for accessibility) Jens Meiert (Friday, 27 May)
3.1: Proposal with updates from 26 May call John M Slatin (Friday, 27 May)
- Re: 3.1: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Tim Boland (Friday, 27 May)
- RE: 3.1: Proposal with updates from 26 May call John M Slatin (Friday, 27 May)
- Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Ineke van der Maat (Friday, 27 May)
  - Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 27 May)
    - Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Ineke van der Maat (Friday, 27 May)
    - RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 27 May)
    - Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Ineke van der Maat (Saturday, 28 May)
    - Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Tim Boland (Tuesday, 31 May)
  - RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Yvette Hoitink (Friday, 27 May)
    - Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Ineke van der Maat (Friday, 27 May)
    - RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 27 May)
    - RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call John M Slatin (Friday, 27 May)
    - RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Joe Clark (Friday, 27 May)
    - RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call John M Slatin (Friday, 27 May)
    - RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Joe Clark (Friday, 27 May)
- RE: 3.1: Proposal with updates from 26 May call Tim Boland (Friday, 27 May)
(very minor) addition to 25 May 2005 WCAG TTF minutes? Tim Boland (Friday, 27 May)
[minutes] 26 May 2005 telecon Wendy Chisholm (Thursday, 26 May)
Regrets: Agenda: 26 May 2005 Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) (Thursday, 26 May)
3.1 REQUIRING NON-TEXT ALTERNATES TO TEXT Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 26 May)
RE 3.1 proposal - first half Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 26 May)
- Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Ineke van der Maat (Thursday, 26 May)
  - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 26 May)
- RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half John M Slatin (Thursday, 26 May)
- Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Joe Clark (Thursday, 26 May)
  - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 26 May)
    - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Joe Clark (Thursday, 26 May)
  - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half 2 Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 26 May)
    - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half 2 Joe Clark (Thursday, 26 May)
    - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half 2 Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 27 May)
  - Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Ineke van der Maat (Thursday, 26 May)
- RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half John M Slatin (Thursday, 26 May)
  - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Joe Clark (Thursday, 26 May)
    - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 27 May)
    - Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Jason White (Friday, 27 May)
    - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 27 May)
    - Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Ineke van der Maat (Friday, 27 May)
    - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 27 May)
    - Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Ineke van der Maat (Friday, 27 May)
    - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Yvette Hoitink (Friday, 27 May)
    - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Gregg Vanderheiden (Saturday, 28 May)
- Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Ineke van der Maat (Friday, 27 May)
  - RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half Yvette Hoitink (Friday, 27 May)
Agenda: 26 May 2005 ========================= Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 25 May)
- Re: Agenda: 26 May 2005 (with corrected guideline 2.2 survey link) Ben Caldwell (Wednesday, 25 May)
- Re: Agenda: 26 May 2005 ========================= Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG) (Wednesday, 25 May)
- Re: Agenda: 26 May 2005 ========================= Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. - (Thursday, 26 May)
  - Regrets: Agenda: 26 May 2005 ========================= WATANABE Takayuki (Thursday, 26 May)
- regrets: Agenda: 26 May 2005 Roberto Ellero (Thursday, 26 May)
Responses to comments on GL 3.1 proposal John M Slatin (Wednesday, 25 May)
- Re: Responses to comments on GL 3.1 proposal Jason White (Thursday, 26 May)
3.1: Proposal with several updated SC John M Slatin (Tuesday, 24 May)
- Re: 3.1: Proposal with several updated SC Jason White (Wednesday, 25 May)
- Re: 3.1: Proposal with several updated SC Joe Clark (Thursday, 26 May)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 25 May 2005 Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 24 May)
Guideline 4.1 (use-spec) Issue Summary Ben Caldwell (Tuesday, 24 May)
GL 3.2 proposal and summary Li, Alex (Tuesday, 24 May)
- Re: GL 3.2 proposal and summary Loretta Guarino Reid (Tuesday, 24 May)
- RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary John M Slatin (Wednesday, 25 May)
  - RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary Jason White (Thursday, 26 May)
- RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary Li, Alex (Wednesday, 1 June)
- RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary John M Slatin (Wednesday, 1 June)
- RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary Li, Alex (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] Christophe Strobbe (Tuesday, 24 May)
- RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 24 May)
  - RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] Christophe Strobbe (Tuesday, 24 May)
    - RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 24 May)
    - RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] Christophe Strobbe (Wednesday, 25 May)
    - RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 25 May)
    - RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] Jason White (Thursday, 26 May)
    - Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] Carlos A Velasco (Thursday, 26 May)
    - Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] Ineke van der Maat (Thursday, 26 May)
    - Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] Christophe Strobbe (Thursday, 26 May)
- Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text] lguarino@adobe.com (Thursday, 26 May)
GL 2.2 proposals and issue summary Christophe Strobbe (Tuesday, 24 May)
[TECHS] Techniques issues summary for Guideline 2.5 Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Monday, 23 May)
- RE: [TECHS] Techniques issues summary for Guideline 2.5 Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 24 May)
- RE: [TECHS] Techniques issues summary for Guideline 2.5 David MacDonald (Tuesday, 24 May)
Outside expert opinion on Web standards and WCAG (especially GL 1.3) Joe Clark (Monday, 23 May)
- Re: Outside expert opinion on Web standards and WCAG (especially GL 1.3) Jason White (Tuesday, 24 May)
Ill-defined terms in WCAG 2 Joe Clark (Monday, 23 May)
- RE: Ill-defined terms in WCAG 2 Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 23 May)
"Accessibility features" Joe Clark (Monday, 23 May)
- Re: "Accessibility features" lguarino@adobe.com (Monday, 23 May)
  - Re: "Accessibility features" Jason White (Tuesday, 24 May)
    - Re: "Accessibility features" Jason White (Tuesday, 24 May)
Further articles documenting the sense of "semantics" Joe Clark (Monday, 23 May)
Items to keep in mind for Principle 3: "Content and controls must be understandable" Joe Clark (Monday, 23 May)
Bugzilla down? Li, Alex (Monday, 23 May)
- Re: Bugzilla down? Ben Caldwell (Monday, 23 May)
NEW: Issue #1526 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Saturday, 21 May)
[4.1] Article on when to create custom DTD's (and when not to) John M Slatin (Friday, 20 May)
CLOSED: Issue #180 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Friday, 20 May)
late regrets: David MacDonald (Friday, 20 May)
[minutes] 19 May 2005 WCAG WG telecon Wendy Chisholm (Thursday, 19 May)
- Re: [minutes] 19 May 2005 WCAG WG telecon Joe Clark (Thursday, 19 May)
- Re: [minutes] 19 May 2005 WCAG WG telecon lguarino@adobe.com (Monday, 23 May)
Regrets for today's call (05/19) Roberto Ellero (Thursday, 19 May)
Regrets for today's call (05/19) Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG) (Thursday, 19 May)
Regrets for this evening (R. Scano and L. Mascaro) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG (Thursday, 19 May)
- Re: Regrets for this evening WATANABE Takayuki (Thursday, 19 May)
NEW: Issue #1525 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Thursday, 19 May)
possible regrets for Thursday plus suggestion? Tim Boland (Wednesday, 18 May)
Agenda + Announcement: 19 May 2005 John M Slatin (Wednesday, 18 May)
- RE: Agenda + Announcement: 19 May 2005 Yvette Hoitink (Thursday, 19 May)
- Regrets: Agenda 19 May 2005 Roberto Castaldo (Thursday, 19 May)
ISSUE SuMMARY for 2.3 Avoiding Content that provokes siezures Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 17 May)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 18 May 2005 Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 17 May)
[techs] regrets for Wednesday's WCAG TTF call Tim Boland (Monday, 16 May)
GL 4.2: Revised modification to the conformance section lguarino@adobe.com (Monday, 16 May)
addition proposal, GL 4.2 lguarino@adobe.com (Monday, 16 May)
- Re: addition proposal, GL 4.2 Joe Clark (Monday, 16 May)
- RE: addition proposal, GL 4.2 Michael Cooper (Wednesday, 18 May)
  - RE: addition proposal, GL 4.2 Gregg Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 18 May)
  - RE: addition proposal, GL 4.2 Jason White (Thursday, 19 May)
    - Re: addition proposal, GL 4.2 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG (Thursday, 19 May)
[Techs] proposed definitions re: my May 11 WCAG TTF Action Item Tim Boland (Monday, 16 May)
- Re: [Techs] proposed definitions re: my May 11 WCAG TTF Action Item Lisa Seeman (Monday, 16 May)
- RE: [Techs] proposed definitions re: my May 11 WCAG TTF Action Item John M Slatin (Monday, 16 May)
Re: RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) lguarino@adobe.com (Saturday, 14 May)
RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) John M Slatin (Friday, 13 May)
RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, Mike Barta (Friday, 13 May)
- RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, John M Slatin (Friday, 13 May)
move proposed SC to GL 1.3? Loretta Guarino Reid (Friday, 13 May)
- Re: move proposed SC to GL 1.3? Joe Clark (Monday, 16 May)
- Re: move proposed SC to GL 1.3? lguarino@adobe.com (Monday, 23 May)
Declaring educational level Jason White (Friday, 13 May)
changing state and value programmatically Loretta Guarino Reid (Friday, 13 May)
Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) Joe Clark (Thursday, 12 May)
- Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) Jason White (Friday, 13 May)
  - Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, Tim Boland (Friday, 13 May)
  - Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) Joe Clark (Friday, 13 May)
    - Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send) Jason White (Saturday, 14 May)
Regrets for 12 May 2005 call Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG) (Thursday, 12 May)
JavaScript action example Joe Clark (Thursday, 12 May)
- Re: JavaScript action example Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Thursday, 12 May)
Agenda addendum: link to proposed SC for GL 1.3 John M Slatin (Thursday, 12 May)
Why 2GL .4 isn't on the agenda this week John M Slatin (Thursday, 12 May)
Agenda update: 12 May 2005 John M Slatin (Thursday, 12 May)
- Regrets (RE: Agenda update: 12 May 2005) Yvette Hoitink (Thursday, 12 May)
- late Regrets: Agenda update: 12 May 2005 WATANABE Takayuki (Friday, 13 May)
Baseline definition Loretta Guarino Reid (Thursday, 12 May)
[w3c-wai-gl] <none> Ben Caldwell (Wednesday, 11 May)
[techs] Minutes of 11 May 2005 Techniques teleconference Michael Cooper (Wednesday, 11 May)
- Re: [techs] Minutes of 11 May 2005 Techniques teleconference Ben Caldwell (Wednesday, 11 May)
Fwd: Test Development FAQ released Tim Boland (Wednesday, 11 May)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 11 May 2005 Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 10 May)
Agenda: 12 May 2005 John M Slatin (Tuesday, 10 May)
- Re: Agenda: 12 May 2005 Tim Boland (Wednesday, 11 May)
- Regrets: Agenda: 12 May 2005 Roberto Castaldo (Thursday, 12 May)
  - Regrets: Agenda: 12 May 2005 Neil Soiffer (Thursday, 12 May)
- Late regrets: Agenda: 12 May 2005 Roberto Ellero (Friday, 13 May)
[Techs] Regrets for Wednesday John M Slatin (Monday, 9 May)
(1.3) Validation and semantics recap Joe Clark (Friday, 6 May)
- RE: (1.3) Validation and semantics recap John M Slatin (Monday, 9 May)
Stevie Wonder does music video with audio description John M Slatin (Friday, 6 May)
[Techs-scripting]FW: setting focus on a form field using javascript John M Slatin (Friday, 6 May)
- Re: [Techs-scripting]FW: setting focus on a form field using javascript Jim Ley (Friday, 6 May)
working definition of baseline lguarino@adobe.com (Thursday, 5 May)
- Re: working definition of baseline Jason White (Friday, 6 May)
  - Re: working definition of baseline Alan Chuter (Friday, 6 May)
    - Re: working definition of baseline Jason White (Friday, 6 May)
  - Re: working definition of baseline Jason White (Friday, 6 May)
    - RE: working definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 6 May)
- RE: working definition of baseline John M Slatin (Friday, 6 May)
  - RE: working definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 6 May)
- RE: working definition of baseline Mike Barta (Friday, 6 May)
  - RE: working definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 6 May)
- RE: RE: working definition of baseline Tim Boland (Friday, 6 May)
- Re: working definition of baseline lguarino@adobe.com (Friday, 6 May)
  - Re: working definition of baseline Jason White (Saturday, 7 May)
- RE: working definition of baseline John M Slatin (Friday, 6 May)
- RE: working definition of baseline Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 10 May)
  - Re: RE: working definition of baseline lguarino@adobe.com (Friday, 6 May)
    - Re: RE: working definition of baseline Jason White (Saturday, 7 May)
  - RE: RE: working definition of baseline John M Slatin (Friday, 6 May)
    - RE: RE: working definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 6 May)
    - Re: RE: working definition of baseline Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG (Friday, 6 May)
    - RE: RE: working definition of baseline Jason White (Saturday, 7 May)
    - RE: RE: working definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Sunday, 8 May)
    - Re: RE: working definition of baseline Jason White (Monday, 9 May)
    - RE: RE: working definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 9 May)
  - Re: RE: working definition of baseline lguarino@adobe.com (Friday, 6 May)
  - Re: RE: working definition of baseline lguarino@adobe.com (Saturday, 7 May)
    - Re: RE: working definition of baseline Jason White (Saturday, 7 May)
  - RE: RE: working definition of baseline John M Slatin (Monday, 9 May)
    - Re: RE: working definition of baseline Jason White (Monday, 9 May)
    - RE: RE: working definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 9 May)
    - Re: RE: working definition of baseline 'Jason White' (Monday, 9 May)
    - RE: RE: working definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 9 May)
    - Re: RE: working definition of baseline 'Jason White' (Monday, 9 May)
    - RE: RE: working definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Monday, 9 May)
    - Re: RE: working definition of baseline 'Jason White' (Tuesday, 10 May)
  - RE: RE: working definition of baseline Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 10 May)
    - RE: RE: working definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 10 May)
    - Re: RE: working definition of baseline 'Jason White' (Wednesday, 11 May)
    - Re: RE: working definition of baseline Neil Soiffer (Wednesday, 11 May)
  - regrets Luca Mascaro (Tuesday, 10 May)
  - Implications of proposed baseline definitions Jason White (Wednesday, 11 May)
    - Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions Tim Boland (Wednesday, 11 May)
    - RE: Implications of proposed baseline definitions John M Slatin (Wednesday, 11 May)
    - Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions lguarino@adobe.com (Wednesday, 11 May)
    - Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions Sailesh Panchang (Wednesday, 11 May)
    - Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions lguarino@adobe.com (Wednesday, 11 May)
    - Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions Joe Clark (Wednesday, 25 May)
    - Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions Jason White (Thursday, 26 May)
    - Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions Jason White (Thursday, 26 May)
    - Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions lguarino@adobe.com (Wednesday, 25 May)
User agent assumptions - vs - baseline Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 5 May)
Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005 John M Slatin (Thursday, 5 May)
- Regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005 WATANABE Takayuki (Thursday, 5 May)
  - Regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG (Thursday, 5 May)
- Regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005 Neil Soiffer (Thursday, 5 May)
- regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005 Roberto Ellero (Thursday, 5 May)
3.1 Issue summary John M Slatin (Wednesday, 4 May)
3.1 comments Lisa Seeman (Wednesday, 4 May)
- Re: 3.1 comments Ineke van der Maat (Thursday, 5 May)
- RE: 3.1 comments John M Slatin (Thursday, 5 May)
  - regrets Lisa Seeman (Tuesday, 10 May)
regrets for 5 May telecon Christophe Strobbe (Wednesday, 4 May)
Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal Yvette Hoitink (Wednesday, 4 May)
- Re: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal Andi Snow-Weaver (Wednesday, 4 May)
  - RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 5 May)
  - RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal Yvette Hoitink (Thursday, 5 May)
    - Re: RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal lguarino@adobe.com (Thursday, 5 May)
    - Re: RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal John M Slatin (Thursday, 5 May)
    - RE: RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal Yvette Hoitink (Thursday, 5 May)
    - about semantical use of markup Luca Mascaro (Thursday, 5 May)
- RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal John M Slatin (Wednesday, 4 May)
- RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal John M Slatin (Thursday, 5 May)
  - RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 5 May)
  - RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal Jason White (Thursday, 5 May)
- RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal Li, Alex (Thursday, 5 May)
- RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal Tim Boland (Thursday, 5 May)
- RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal John M Slatin (Thursday, 5 May)
- Re: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal Ben Caldwell (Thursday, 5 May)
- Re: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal John M Slatin (Thursday, 5 May)
Agenda: 5 May 2005 John M Slatin (Wednesday, 4 May)
- RE: Agenda: 5 May 2005 Li, Alex (Wednesday, 4 May)
programmatically determined Lisa Seeman (Wednesday, 4 May)
3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs John M Slatin (Wednesday, 4 May)
- overview of 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs Lisa Seeman (Wednesday, 4 May)
- Re: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs Joe Clark (Wednesday, 4 May)
  - Re: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs Lisa Seeman (Tuesday, 10 May)
- RE: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs John M Slatin (Wednesday, 11 May)
  - RE: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs Joe Clark (Wednesday, 11 May)
- Re: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs WATANABE Takayuki (Thursday, 12 May)
NEW: Issue #1523 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 4 May)
NEW: Issue #1524 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Wednesday, 4 May)
Revised Proposal, GL 4.2 Loretta Guarino Reid (Wednesday, 4 May)
GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal Andi Snow-Weaver (Tuesday, 3 May)
- Re: GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal Ben Caldwell (Thursday, 5 May)
- Re: GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal John M Slatin (Thursday, 5 May)
- RE: GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal Andi Snow-Weaver (Wednesday, 18 May)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 04 May 2005 Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 3 May)
RE: RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" Loretta Guarino Reid (Tuesday, 3 May)
[tech] 4.2 Summary David MacDonald (Tuesday, 3 May)
[techs] requirements updated Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 3 May)
The next WCAG WG face-to-face will be in Brussels 13-16 June Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 3 May)
[techs] Please review issue summaries Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 3 May)
[2.4] Proposal for guideline 2.4 Yvette Hoitink (Tuesday, 3 May)
- Re: [2.4] Proposal for guideline 2.4 Andi Snow-Weaver (Wednesday, 4 May)
  - RE: [2.4] Proposal for guideline 2.4 Yvette Hoitink (Wednesday, 4 May)
Fwd: [PUBLICATION] QA Specification Tim Boland (Tuesday, 3 May)
[tech] re: regrets Wed (will have 4.2 by tommorrow) David MacDonald (Tuesday, 3 May)
[tech] re: regrets Wed (will have 4.2 by tommorrow) David MacDonald (Tuesday, 3 May)
[tech] re: regrets Wed (will have 4.2 by tommorrow) David MacDonald (Tuesday, 3 May)
RE: RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" John M Slatin (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" lguarino@adobe.com (Monday, 2 May)
Requiring ATAG conformance lguarino@adobe.com (Monday, 2 May)
- Re: Requiring ATAG conformance Matt May (Monday, 2 May)
[TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 - plain text version Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Monday, 2 May)
- RE: [TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 - plain text version John M Slatin (Wednesday, 4 May)
  - RE: [TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 - plain text version Joe Clark (Wednesday, 4 May)
{TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com (Monday, 2 May)
[techs] Review of techniques issues for Guideline 2.4 Michael Cooper (Monday, 2 May)
RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" Tim Boland (Monday, 2 May)
Sign language video John M Slatin (Friday, 29 April)
[minutes] 28 April 2005 WCAG WG telecon Wendy Chisholm (Friday, 29 April)
[minutes] 27 April Techniques Task Force of the WCAG WG telecon Wendy Chisholm (Friday, 29 April)
Guideline 1.3 and user interface changes Jason White (Thursday, 28 April)
- RE: Guideline 1.3 and user interface changes Jason White (Saturday, 30 April)
- RE: Guideline 1.3 and user interface changes Gregg Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 3 May)
Late regrets for 28 April 2005 call Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Late regrets for 28 April 2005 call Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. - (Friday, 29 April)
[1.1] Proposal for new example Yvette Hoitink (Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
- RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
  - RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) Yvette Hoitink (Friday, 29 April)
- RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) John M Slatin (Friday, 29 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Functional text content) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Definition of functionality) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Definition of content) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
- RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Definition of content) Gregg Vanderheiden (Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (ASCII art) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 8) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7) Joe Clark (Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
- RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) Joe Clark (Thursday, 28 April)
  - Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) Wendy Chisholm (Thursday, 28 April)
- RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
  - Re: RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) lguarino@adobe.com (Thursday, 28 April)
    - Re: RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) Joe Clark (Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4) John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
Fwd: Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible lguarino@adobe.com (Thursday, 28 April)
Re: [Techs] Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips Bailey, Bruce (Thursday, 28 April)
double regrets info@lucamascaro.info (Thursday, 28 April)
NEW: Issue #1521 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Thursday, 28 April)
NEW: Issue #1522 bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu (Thursday, 28 April)
[Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable" John M Slatin (Wednesday, 27 April)
- RE: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable" John M Slatin (Wednesday, 27 April)
- RE: [Techs]Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips David MacDonald (Wednesday, 27 April)
  - RE: [Techs]Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips Joe Clark (Wednesday, 27 April)
  - RE: [Techs]Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips John M Slatin (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable" boland@nist.gov (Thursday, 28 April)
- RE: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable" John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
- RE: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable" John M Slatin (Thursday, 28 April)
Agenda: 28 April 2005 John M Slatin (Wednesday, 27 April)
- RE: Agenda: 28 April 2005 Yvette Hoitink (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Regrets: Agenda: 28 April 2005 Roberto Castaldo (Thursday, 28 April)
  - Re: Regrets: Agenda: 28 April 2005 WATANABE Takayuki (Thursday, 28 April)
- regrets: Agenda: 28 April 2005 Roberto Ellero (Thursday, 28 April)
[techs] Changes in requirements doc Michael Cooper (Wednesday, 27 April)
Proposal for Guideline 1.1 Wendy Chisholm (Wednesday, 27 April)
Issues summary, GL 4.2 Loretta Guarino Reid (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Graceful degradation (was: Re: Issues summary, GL 4.2) Joe Clark (Wednesday, 27 April)
  - Re: Graceful degradation (was: Re: Issues summary, GL 4.2) lguarino@adobe.com (Wednesday, 27 April)
    - Re: Graceful degradation (was: Re: Issues summary, GL 4.2) Jason White (Thursday, 28 April)
Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible Loretta Guarino Reid (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible Joe Clark (Wednesday, 27 April)
- RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible John M Slatin (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible John M Slatin (Wednesday, 27 April)
  - Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible