W3C home
>
Mailing lists
>
Public
>
w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>
April to June 2005
w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from April to June 2005 by author
995 messages
:
Starting
Friday, 1 April 2005 01:13:29 GMT,
Ending
Thursday, 30 June 2005 20:45:43 GMT
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Mail actions
: [
mail a new topic
]
Help
: [
How to use the archives
] [
Search in the archives
]
'Jason White'
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Wednesday, 11 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Tuesday, 10 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Monday, 9 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Monday, 9 May)
Alan Chuter
Re: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
Andi Snow-Weaver
Updated mapping of WCAG 1.0 checkpoints to WCAG 2.0 success criteria
(Thursday, 30 June)
Conformance Issues
(Wednesday, 8 June)
GL 2.5 Remaining 3 issues
(Wednesday, 8 June)
RE: GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal
(Wednesday, 18 May)
Re: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Wednesday, 4 May)
Re: [2.4] Proposal for guideline 2.4
(Wednesday, 4 May)
GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal
(Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Agenda: 21 April 2005
(Thursday, 21 April)
Re: Agenda: Thursday 14 April
(Wednesday, 13 April)
Conformance Requirements proposal
(Friday, 8 April)
Re: Definition of "baseline"
(Friday, 8 April)
Andres Gonzalez
RE: Screen Reader Supported Languages
(Friday, 8 April)
Avi Arditti
Re: Freedom of speech (Was RE: Another update to the proposal)
(Wednesday, 1 June)
Bailey, Bruce
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?
(Sunday, 26 June)
RE: Summing up the debate about validity at Priority 1 or 2
(Thursday, 23 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2?
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2?
(Monday, 20 June)
Should validity be P1 or P2? (was Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers)
(Monday, 20 June)
Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Saturday, 18 June)
RE: Validation as test for basic accessibility
(Thursday, 16 June)
Validation as test for basic accessibility
(Wednesday, 15 June)
RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [Techs] Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: WARNING: Yet another virus sent by 'Wendy'
(Monday, 11 April)
Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: Agenda 6/30/05 - partial regrets
(Thursday, 30 June)
GL 1.3 issue summary against June 30 draft
(Thursday, 30 June)
Re: Agenda: 23 June Telecon - partial regrets
(Thursday, 23 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Tuesday, 21 June)
[TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information
(Wednesday, 15 June)
[TECHS] Review of SC with respect to Scripting and baseline issues.
(Monday, 6 June)
Updated proposal for GL 1.3 L1 SC2
(Tuesday, 31 May)
[TECHS] Techniques issues summary for Guideline 2.5
(Monday, 23 May)
Re: JavaScript action example
(Thursday, 12 May)
[TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 - plain text version
(Monday, 2 May)
{TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3
(Monday, 2 May)
Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary)
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 27 April 2005
(Wednesday, 27 April)
[TECHS] Possible Scripting Techniques with Guideline Mappings
(Tuesday, 26 April)
Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary)
(Monday, 25 April)
Re: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Sunday, 24 April)
Re: Loretta's analysis of UAAG Guideline 9
(Sunday, 24 April)
Re: Guideline 4.2 Subgroup Report
(Sunday, 24 April)
re: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4
(Sunday, 24 April)
[TECHS] draft introduction to client side scripting techniques
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Re: Example of baseline information included in HTML Technique 12.4
(Monday, 11 April)
Example of baseline information included in HTML Technique 12.4
(Monday, 11 April)
Example of Baseline information included in HTML Technique 5.11
(Monday, 11 April)
RE: Screen Reader Supported Languages
(Friday, 8 April)
Screen Reader Supported Languages
(Friday, 8 April)
Ben Caldwell
checklist prototype
(Thursday, 23 June)
Guideline 1.3 SC
(Wednesday, 22 June)
content arranged in a sequence that affects meaning
(Wednesday, 22 June)
F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates
(Thursday, 16 June)
Proposals from June 13 Face to Face
(Monday, 13 June)
Updated Survey for 4.1
(Friday, 10 June)
June 1 Draft
(Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: Agenda: 26 May 2005 (with corrected guideline 2.2 survey link)
(Wednesday, 25 May)
Guideline 4.1 (use-spec) Issue Summary
(Tuesday, 24 May)
Re: Bugzilla down?
(Monday, 23 May)
[w3c-wai-gl] <none>
(Wednesday, 11 May)
Re: [techs] Minutes of 11 May 2005 Techniques teleconference
(Wednesday, 11 May)
Re: GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
Re: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
Regrets for next week
(Thursday, 21 April)
Re: [TECHS] draft introduction to client side scripting techniques
(Wednesday, 20 April)
boland@nist.gov
Re: checklist prototype
(Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 June 2005
(Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: Agenda Update: 2 June 2005
(Thursday, 2 June)
RE: Text being imperceptible (allegedly)
(Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 June 2005
(Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable"
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 27 April 2005
(Tuesday, 26 April)
RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Monday, 25 April)
bugzilla@webby.trace.wisc.edu
NEW: Issue #1534
(Wednesday, 22 June)
CLOSED: Issue #777
(Wednesday, 15 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1259
(Wednesday, 15 June)
CLOSED: Issue #659
(Wednesday, 15 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1422
(Wednesday, 15 June)
NEW: Issue #1533
(Saturday, 11 June)
NEW: Issue #1531
(Friday, 10 June)
NEW: Issue #1530
(Friday, 10 June)
CLOSED: Issue #503
(Wednesday, 8 June)
CLOSED: Issue #478
(Wednesday, 8 June)
NEW: Issue #1528
(Wednesday, 8 June)
NEW: Issue #1529
(Wednesday, 8 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1355
(Tuesday, 7 June)
CLOSED: Issue #965
(Saturday, 4 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1501
(Wednesday, 1 June)
CLOSED: Issue #802
(Wednesday, 1 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1225
(Wednesday, 1 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1500
(Wednesday, 1 June)
CLOSED: Issue #1457
(Saturday, 28 May)
NEW: Issue #1526
(Saturday, 21 May)
CLOSED: Issue #180
(Friday, 20 May)
NEW: Issue #1525
(Thursday, 19 May)
NEW: Issue #1523
(Wednesday, 4 May)
NEW: Issue #1524
(Wednesday, 4 May)
NEW: Issue #1521
(Thursday, 28 April)
NEW: Issue #1522
(Thursday, 28 April)
NEW: Issue #1520
(Saturday, 23 April)
NEW: Issue #1509
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1519
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1515
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1510
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1495
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1494
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1504
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1506
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1499
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1500
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1514
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1497
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1518
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1490
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1502
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1501
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1498
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1493
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1513
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1507
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1512
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1511
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1489
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1517
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1516
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1491
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1503
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1496
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1488
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1487
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1508
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1505
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1492
(Thursday, 7 April)
NEW: Issue #1486
(Thursday, 7 April)
Carlos A Velasco
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Thursday, 26 May)
Chris Ridpath
Re: About tests 37-41 (headers)
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: Need for exemptions for teaching materials, samples, multilingual documents
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Re: Test files review, #75, 76, 77, 78¸ 79, 27, 128, 129, 183
(Wednesday, 13 April)
Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files.
(Monday, 11 April)
Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files.
(Monday, 11 April)
Christophe Strobbe
Start time of WCAG telecon (was:Re: Agenda 6/30/05)
(Thursday, 30 June)
GL 2.2 issue summary (close/clarify/not addressed)
(Thursday, 30 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Thursday, 23 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)]
(Monday, 20 June)
Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)
(Friday, 17 June)
GL 2.2: updated proposals
(Wednesday, 15 June)
GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy)
(Sunday, 5 June)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Thursday, 26 May)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Wednesday, 25 May)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Tuesday, 24 May)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Tuesday, 24 May)
GL 2.2 proposals and issue summary
(Tuesday, 24 May)
regrets for 5 May telecon
(Wednesday, 4 May)
Regrets for 27 & 28 April telecons
(Monday, 25 April)
RE: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary)
(Saturday, 23 April)
Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary)
(Friday, 22 April)
Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary)
(Thursday, 21 April)
David Dorward
Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?)
(Thursday, 23 June)
Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?)
(Thursday, 23 June)
XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: HTML/XHTML, mime-types, Strict & Transitional [was Re: Semantics]
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?
(Monday, 20 June)
HTML/XHTML, mime-types, Strict & Transitional [was Re: Semantics]
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Accessible quotation style in email (was Re: HTML messages)
(Monday, 25 April)
Accessible quotation style in email (was Re: HTML messages)
(Monday, 25 April)
David MacDonald
remove validity completely?
(Wednesday, 22 June)
test
(Tuesday, 21 June)
perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
(Tuesday, 21 June)
RE: About tests 37-41 (headers)
(Saturday, 18 June)
RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
1.4 background sound
(Tuesday, 14 June)
Input for F2F on Guide and general techniques
(Thursday, 9 June)
RE: [TECHS] Techniques issues summary for Guideline 2.5
(Tuesday, 24 May)
late regrets:
(Friday, 20 May)
[tech] 4.2 Summary
(Tuesday, 3 May)
[tech] re: regrets Wed (will have 4.2 by tommorrow)
(Tuesday, 3 May)
[tech] re: regrets Wed (will have 4.2 by tommorrow)
(Tuesday, 3 May)
[tech] re: regrets Wed (will have 4.2 by tommorrow)
(Tuesday, 3 May)
RE: [Techs]Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips
(Wednesday, 27 April)
List of HTML Techniques not affected by baseline and list of affected
(Wednesday, 13 April)
HTML Techniques16.1, 10.6 baseline Discussion
(Wednesday, 13 April)
RE: Test files review, #75, 76, 77, 78¸ 79, 27, 128, 129, 183
(Tuesday, 12 April)
RE: [TECHS] Object tag test files.
(Thursday, 7 April)
[TECHS] Object tag test files.
(Thursday, 7 April)
RE: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005
(Tuesday, 5 April)
Doyle-Work
Early Regrets - April 28th
(Thursday, 21 April)
Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files.
(Thursday, 7 April)
Re: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005
(Tuesday, 5 April)
Conformance Claims - W3C Logo Use
(Friday, 1 April)
Gez Lemon
Re: checklist prototype
(Thursday, 23 June)
Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?)
(Thursday, 23 June)
Reasons to move validity back to P1
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: About tests 37-41 (headers)
(Saturday, 18 June)
Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Thursday, 16 June)
Gregg Vanderheiden
Agenda 6/30/05 =======================
(Monday, 27 June)
FW: Summing up the debate about validity at Priority 1 or 2
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Not over til its over - hang in there whatever your view(s).
(Wednesday, 22 June)
a note on voluntary standards and policy related standards
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)]
(Saturday, 18 June)
Done - Revisited
(Friday, 17 June)
Over
(Thursday, 16 June)
FW: 4.2 notes/proposals
(Thursday, 16 June)
2.3 Guideline revisions proposal
(Thursday, 16 June)
2 levels or 3
(Thursday, 16 June)
Over
(Thursday, 16 June)
9 June 2005 Agenda [=================================
(Wednesday, 8 June)
Issue Summary 1.4
(Wednesday, 8 June)
* Can we Start 1 hour early for Thursday call????
(Tuesday, 7 June)
RE: Level 3
(Monday, 6 June)
RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy)
(Monday, 6 June)
RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy)
(Sunday, 5 June)
RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy)
(Sunday, 5 June)
Provide Feedback on Straw poll forms
(Thursday, 2 June)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Saturday, 28 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Friday, 27 May)
points to Ponder
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: Usability issues in Ajax/Web applications (with implications for accessibility)
(Friday, 27 May)
Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half 2
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half 2
(Thursday, 26 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Thursday, 26 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Thursday, 26 May)
3.1 REQUIRING NON-TEXT ALTERNATES TO TEXT
(Thursday, 26 May)
RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Thursday, 26 May)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Wednesday, 25 May)
Agenda: 26 May 2005 =========================
(Wednesday, 25 May)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Tuesday, 24 May)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Tuesday, 24 May)
RE: [TECHS] Techniques issues summary for Guideline 2.5
(Tuesday, 24 May)
RE: Ill-defined terms in WCAG 2
(Monday, 23 May)
RE: addition proposal, GL 4.2
(Wednesday, 18 May)
ISSUE SuMMARY for 2.3 Avoiding Content that provokes siezures
(Tuesday, 17 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Tuesday, 10 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Monday, 9 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Monday, 9 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Monday, 9 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Monday, 9 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Sunday, 8 May)
RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
User agent assumptions - vs - baseline
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: Guideline 1.3 and user interface changes
(Tuesday, 3 May)
The next WCAG WG face-to-face will be in Brussels 13-16 June
(Tuesday, 3 May)
RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Sunday, 1 May)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Sunday, 1 May)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Sunday, 1 May)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Friday, 29 April)
RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Definition of content)
(Thursday, 28 April)
non-text content
(Thursday, 21 April)
issue 1214. 2.4: 1194.22-like SC should be level 1 [21]
(Thursday, 21 April)
RE: Definition of "baseline"
(Saturday, 9 April)
RE: Definition of "baseline"
(Saturday, 9 April)
RE: Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: RE: RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: Background audio (was: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes)
(Friday, 1 April)
Ineke van der Maat
Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy)
(Monday, 6 June)
Re: Another update to the proposal
(Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Saturday, 28 May)
Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Friday, 27 May)
Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Friday, 27 May)
Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
Re: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Friday, 27 May)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: 3.1 comments
(Thursday, 5 May)
info@lucamascaro.info
Re: checklist prototype
(Thursday, 23 June)
Re: R: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Tuesday, 14 June)
double regrets
(Thursday, 28 April)
Isofarro
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Fwd: Re: [TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information (fwd)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: [script-techs] Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation
(Monday, 25 April)
Re: [script-techs] Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation
(Thursday, 21 April)
Re: Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation
(Wednesday, 20 April)
[Fwd: Re: Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation]
(Wednesday, 20 April)
Re: Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation
(Wednesday, 20 April)
Jason White
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 27 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Thursday, 23 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: Level 3
(Monday, 13 June)
Re: Definition of "semantics"
(Monday, 13 June)
Re: Updated proposal for GL 1.3 L1 SC2
(Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions
(Thursday, 26 May)
RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: Responses to comments on GL 3.1 proposal
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: 3.1: Proposal with several updated SC
(Wednesday, 25 May)
Re: "Accessibility features"
(Tuesday, 24 May)
Re: Outside expert opinion on Web standards and WCAG (especially GL 1.3)
(Tuesday, 24 May)
Re: "Accessibility features"
(Tuesday, 24 May)
RE: addition proposal, GL 4.2
(Thursday, 19 May)
Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send)
(Saturday, 14 May)
Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send)
(Friday, 13 May)
Declaring educational level
(Friday, 13 May)
Implications of proposed baseline definitions
(Wednesday, 11 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Monday, 9 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Monday, 9 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Saturday, 7 May)
Re: working definition of baseline
(Saturday, 7 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Saturday, 7 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Saturday, 7 May)
Re: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
Re: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
Re: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Sunday, 1 May)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Saturday, 30 April)
RE: Guideline 1.3 and user interface changes
(Saturday, 30 April)
Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Friday, 29 April)
Guideline 1.3 and user interface changes
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Graceful degradation (was: Re: Issues summary, GL 4.2)
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: HTML messages (was: Re: Please comment on issue summaries)
(Tuesday, 26 April)
RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Monday, 25 April)
RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4
(Monday, 25 April)
RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Monday, 25 April)
Re: Need for exemptions for teaching materials, samples, multilingual documents
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Re: [Techs] Divide Techniques docs into chapters?
(Thursday, 14 April)
Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files.
(Monday, 11 April)
Re: WARNING: Yet another virus sent by 'Wendy'
(Sunday, 10 April)
RE: Definition of "baseline"
(Saturday, 9 April)
Re: Definition of "baseline"
(Saturday, 9 April)
RE: Unifying ATAG and UAAG in 4.2 (or surrogate)
(Friday, 8 April)
Re: Definition of "baseline"
(Thursday, 7 April)
Correction (Re: Issues and proposals: conformance claims)
(Thursday, 7 April)
Definition of "baseline"
(Thursday, 7 April)
RE: Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques
(Wednesday, 6 April)
Re: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
Re: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
Re: Issues and proposals: conformance claims
(Wednesday, 6 April)
Regrets for this week
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: Background audio (was: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes)
(Saturday, 2 April)
Re: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes
(Friday, 1 April)
Jenae Andershonis
RE: _Tech] Release date for Mac screen reader
(Thursday, 14 April)
Jens Meiert
Validity and Well-formedness
(Thursday, 23 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: Definition of "semantics"
(Monday, 13 June)
Re: Definition of "semantics"
(Monday, 13 June)
Re: Definition of "semantics"
(Sunday, 12 June)
Re: Usability issues in Ajax/Web applications (with implications for accessibility)
(Friday, 27 May)
WAI CSS and WCAG conformance pages (was: W3C style sheet fix (needed for WCAG conformance pages))
(Monday, 25 April)
HTML messages (was: Re: Please comment on issue summaries)
(Monday, 25 April)
Jim Ley
Re: [Techs-scripting]FW: setting focus on a form field using javascript
(Friday, 6 May)
Re: Possible Scripting Techniques to help with baseline evaluation
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Joe Clark
Web Standards Project Accessibility Task Force
(Sunday, 26 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Thursday, 23 June)
Re: remove validity completely?
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Summing up the debate about validity at Priority 1 or 2
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [techs] examples for techniques requirements document
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Tuesday, 21 June)
RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)]
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Definition of "testable" (was: Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Fwd: Re: [TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information (fwd)
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)]
(Sunday, 19 June)
Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)]
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Thursday, 16 June)
Re: About tests 37-41 (headers)
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Tuesday, 14 June)
Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Monday, 13 June)
Re: Definition of "semantics"
(Monday, 13 June)
Re: Definition of "semantics"
(Monday, 13 June)
Definition of "semantics"
(Sunday, 12 June)
RE: Level 3
(Saturday, 11 June)
RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy)
(Monday, 6 June)
RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy)
(Sunday, 5 June)
Text being imperceptible (allegedly)
(Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: Updated proposal for GL 1.3 L1 SC2
(Wednesday, 1 June)
RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
Usability issues in Ajax/Web applications (with implications for accessibility)
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Thursday, 26 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half 2
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: 3.1: Proposal with several updated SC
(Thursday, 26 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions
(Wednesday, 25 May)
Further articles documenting the sense of "semantics"
(Monday, 23 May)
Outside expert opinion on Web standards and WCAG (especially GL 1.3)
(Monday, 23 May)
Ill-defined terms in WCAG 2
(Monday, 23 May)
"Accessibility features"
(Monday, 23 May)
Items to keep in mind for Principle 3: "Content and controls must be understandable"
(Monday, 23 May)
Re: [minutes] 19 May 2005 WCAG WG telecon
(Thursday, 19 May)
Re: move proposed SC to GL 1.3?
(Monday, 16 May)
Re: addition proposal, GL 4.2
(Monday, 16 May)
Re: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send)
(Friday, 13 May)
Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send)
(Thursday, 12 May)
JavaScript action example
(Thursday, 12 May)
RE: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs
(Wednesday, 11 May)
(1.3) Validation and semantics recap
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: [TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 - plain text version
(Wednesday, 4 May)
Re: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs
(Wednesday, 4 May)
RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Monday, 2 May)
RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4)
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7)
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4)
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: [Techs]Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips
(Wednesday, 27 April)
Graceful degradation (was: Re: Issues summary, GL 4.2)
(Wednesday, 27 April)
Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Wednesday, 27 April)
Re: [techs] Techniques for Guideline 1.3
(Wednesday, 27 April)
Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Tuesday, 26 April)
RE: Accessible quotation style in email (was Re: HTML messages)
(Monday, 25 April)
RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Monday, 25 April)
Unicode encodings
(Friday, 22 April)
One model for validation of JavaScript (vaguely related to 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation")
(Thursday, 21 April)
Re: non-text content
(Thursday, 21 April)
IRC log isn't what we're talking about
(Thursday, 21 April)
Re: UAAG Priority 1 checkpoint analysis summary
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Regrets for Techniques Teleconference 20 April 2005
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Issue summary for 1.3: "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Monday, 18 April)
Need for exemptions for teaching materials, samples, multilingual documents
(Monday, 18 April)
Unifying ATAG and UAAG in 4.2 (or surrogate)
(Thursday, 7 April)
Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files.
(Thursday, 7 April)
Re: [TECHS] Object tag test files.
(Thursday, 7 April)
Johannes Koch
Parsing and extracting information (valid or not)
(Thursday, 23 June)
John M Slatin
Reminder: Call starts early today
(Thursday, 23 June)
RE: content arranged in a sequence that affects meaning
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Introduction: Updated version
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Agenda: 23 June Telecon
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: Fwd: Re: [TECHS] Sample Scripting Techniques with baseline information (fwd)
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
FW: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: Another resource re: testability of WCAG2.0 guidelines and success criteria
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Draft Introduction to WCAG 2.0
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: [techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 June 2005
(Tuesday, 7 June)
RE: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages
(Tuesday, 7 June)
3.1: Action item re foreign passages
(Tuesday, 7 June)
3.1: Another update
(Tuesday, 7 June)
RE: GL 2.2: new benefit (low computer literacy)
(Monday, 6 June)
Agenda: 13-16 June meeting in Brussels
(Friday, 3 June)
RE: Text being imperceptible (allegedly)
(Wednesday, 1 June)
Agenda Update: 2 June 2005
(Wednesday, 1 June)
Agenda: 2 June 2005
(Wednesday, 1 June)
RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary
(Wednesday, 1 June)
3.1: Another update to the proposal
(Wednesday, 1 June)
RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: 3.1: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
3.1: Proposal with updates from 26 May call
(Friday, 27 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Thursday, 26 May)
RE: RE 3.1 proposal - first half
(Thursday, 26 May)
RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary
(Wednesday, 25 May)
Responses to comments on GL 3.1 proposal
(Wednesday, 25 May)
3.1: Proposal with several updated SC
(Tuesday, 24 May)
[4.1] Article on when to create custom DTD's (and when not to)
(Friday, 20 May)
Agenda + Announcement: 19 May 2005
(Wednesday, 18 May)
RE: [Techs] proposed definitions re: my May 11 WCAG TTF Action Item
(Monday, 16 May)
RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send)
(Friday, 13 May)
RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information,
(Friday, 13 May)
Agenda addendum: link to proposed SC for GL 1.3
(Thursday, 12 May)
Why 2GL .4 isn't on the agenda this week
(Thursday, 12 May)
Agenda update: 12 May 2005
(Thursday, 12 May)
RE: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs
(Wednesday, 11 May)
RE: Implications of proposed baseline definitions
(Wednesday, 11 May)
Agenda: 12 May 2005
(Tuesday, 10 May)
[Techs] Regrets for Wednesday
(Monday, 9 May)
RE: (1.3) Validation and semantics recap
(Monday, 9 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Monday, 9 May)
RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
Stevie Wonder does music video with audio description
(Friday, 6 May)
[Techs-scripting]FW: setting focus on a form field using javascript
(Friday, 6 May)
Re: GL 2.5 Issues Summary and Proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
Re: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
Re: RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: 3.1 comments
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Wednesday, 4 May)
3.1 Issue summary
(Wednesday, 4 May)
RE: [TECHS] Techniques Issues for Guideline 1.3 - plain text version
(Wednesday, 4 May)
Agenda: 5 May 2005
(Wednesday, 4 May)
3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs
(Wednesday, 4 May)
RE: RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Tuesday, 3 May)
RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Monday, 2 May)
RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Monday, 2 May)
Sign language video
(Friday, 29 April)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7)
(Friday, 29 April)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7)
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4)
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7)
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Functional text content)
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Definition of functionality)
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Definition of content)
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (ASCII art)
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 8)
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (Example 7)
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4)
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4)
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable"
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable"
(Thursday, 28 April)
FW: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: [Techs]Kurzweil 3000 and WYNN zebra strips
(Wednesday, 27 April)
Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Wednesday, 27 April)
RE: [Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable"
(Wednesday, 27 April)
[Techs] Definition of "Reliably human testable"
(Wednesday, 27 April)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Wednesday, 27 April)
Agenda: 28 April 2005
(Wednesday, 27 April)
RE: Accessible quotation style in email (was Re: HTML messages)
(Monday, 25 April)
RE: Accessible quotation style in email (was Re: HTML messages)
(Monday, 25 April)
RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Monday, 25 April)
RE: HTML messages (was: Re: Please comment on issue summaries)
(Monday, 25 April)
RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4
(Sunday, 24 April)
RE: Action item: Rewriting 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Sunday, 24 April)
RE: UAAG Priority 1 checkpoint analysis summary
(Saturday, 23 April)
RE: Wendy's analysis of UAAG Guideline 6
(Saturday, 23 April)
RE: Loretta's analysis of UAAG Guideline 9
(Saturday, 23 April)
[2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4
(Saturday, 23 April)
Please comment on issue summaries
(Saturday, 23 April)
Definition of information (was RE: non-text content)
(Friday, 22 April)
RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4
(Friday, 22 April)
[Techs]Window-Eyes info for matrix
(Wednesday, 20 April)
[Techs] JAWS info for matrix
(Wednesday, 20 April)
Dublin Core Accessibility element
(Wednesday, 20 April)
Agenda (updated) for Thursday 21 April
(Wednesday, 20 April)
FW: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4
(Wednesday, 20 April)
RE: UAAG Priority 1 checkpoint analysis summary
(Wednesday, 20 April)
Agenda: 21 April 2005
(Wednesday, 20 April)
RE: Issue summary for 1.3: "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Strange behavior of mail archive?
(Tuesday, 19 April)
RE: [2.4] Summary of issues for guideline 2.4
(Monday, 18 April)
Guide doc: resend of Wendy's HTML-Techs mockup
(Thursday, 14 April)
Re: Guide doc: Drafts to discuss on Thursday
(Thursday, 14 April)
Agenda correction: Today's call starts same time as always
(Thursday, 14 April)
_Tech] Release date for Mac screen reader
(Thursday, 14 April)
[Techs] Divide Techniques docs into chapters?
(Wednesday, 13 April)
RE: Test files review, #75, 76, 77, 78¸ 79, 27, 128, 129, 183
(Wednesday, 13 April)
Agenda: Thursday 14 April
(Wednesday, 13 April)
Guide doc: Drafts to discuss on Thursday
(Wednesday, 13 April)
More info about new JAWS 6.10 features
(Friday, 8 April)
FW: [techlunch] JAWS 6.10 Free Update for 6.0 Users Released
(Friday, 8 April)
Overview of "baseline" (was re: Definition of baseline)def of baseline
(Thursday, 7 April)
RE: Issues and proposals: conformance claims
(Wednesday, 6 April)
Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005
(Tuesday, 5 April)
RE: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes
(Friday, 1 April)
kerstin
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
lguarino@adobe.com
Re: Agenda 6/30/05 =======================
(Thursday, 30 June)
Re: Agenda: 23 June Telecon
(Wednesday, 22 June)
regrets, June 2
(Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 [definition of text]
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions
(Wednesday, 25 May)
Re: "Accessibility features"
(Monday, 23 May)
Re: [minutes] 19 May 2005 WCAG WG telecon
(Monday, 23 May)
Re: move proposed SC to GL 1.3?
(Monday, 23 May)
GL 4.2: Revised modification to the conformance section
(Monday, 16 May)
addition proposal, GL 4.2
(Monday, 16 May)
Re: RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation" (re-send)
(Saturday, 14 May)
Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions
(Wednesday, 11 May)
Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions
(Wednesday, 11 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Saturday, 7 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
Re: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
working definition of baseline
(Thursday, 5 May)
Re: RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
Re: RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Monday, 2 May)
Requiring ATAG conformance
(Monday, 2 May)
Re: RE: Proposal for Guideline 1.1 (specifcally about L1 SC4)
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Thursday, 28 April)
Fwd: Re: Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Thursday, 28 April)
Re: Graceful degradation (was: Re: Issues summary, GL 4.2)
(Wednesday, 27 April)
Re: RE: RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
Re: RE: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
Re: RE: Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Wednesday, 6 April)
Impact Analysis for Guideline 4.2
(Tuesday, 5 April)
Li, Alex
3.2 Proposal version 2
(Friday, 10 June)
RE: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages
(Wednesday, 8 June)
RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary
(Wednesday, 1 June)
RE: GL 3.2 proposal and summary
(Wednesday, 1 June)
GL 3.2 proposal and summary
(Tuesday, 24 May)
Bugzilla down?
(Monday, 23 May)
RE: Agenda + [2.4] CORRECT version of 2.4 proposal
(Thursday, 5 May)
RE: Agenda: 5 May 2005
(Wednesday, 4 May)
Lisa Seeman
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Sorry about double posting
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: 3.1: Another update to the proposal
(Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [Techs] proposed definitions re: my May 11 WCAG TTF Action Item
(Monday, 16 May)
Re: 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs
(Tuesday, 10 May)
regrets
(Tuesday, 10 May)
3.1 comments
(Wednesday, 4 May)
overview of 3.1: Proposal with links to Guide docs
(Wednesday, 4 May)
programmatically determined
(Wednesday, 4 May)
Re: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Wednesday, 27 April)
Re: Please comment on issue summaries
(Monday, 25 April)
Re: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary)
(Thursday, 21 April)
Re: Proposed planning framework
(Wednesday, 20 April)
imporved accessibility metadata paper
(Wednesday, 13 April)
Loretta Guarino Reid
GL 4.2 Issues Summary
(Friday, 24 June)
Re: GL 3.2 proposal and summary
(Tuesday, 24 May)
move proposed SC to GL 1.3?
(Friday, 13 May)
changing state and value programmatically
(Friday, 13 May)
Baseline definition
(Thursday, 12 May)
Revised Proposal, GL 4.2
(Wednesday, 4 May)
RE: RE: Proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information, functionality, and structure are separable from presentation"
(Tuesday, 3 May)
Issues summary, GL 4.2
(Wednesday, 27 April)
Proposal for 4.2, Ensure that user interfaces are accessible
(Tuesday, 26 April)
Loretta's analysis of UAAG Guideline 9
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Wendy's analysis of UAAG Guideline 6
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Wendy's analysis of web applications vs user agents
(Tuesday, 19 April)
UAAG Priority 1 checkpoint analysis summary
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Guideline 4.2 Subgroup Report
(Tuesday, 19 April)
Luca Mascaro
RE: regrets, Agenda 6/30/05
(Thursday, 30 June)
RE: regrets for today's call (06/23)
(Thursday, 23 June)
Why is important require well-formed, validity and richness in XHTML by examples
(Saturday, 18 June)
RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Saturday, 18 June)
RE: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Saturday, 18 June)
RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Thursday, 16 June)
regrets
(Tuesday, 10 May)
about semantical use of markup
(Thursday, 5 May)
Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -
Re: Agenda 6/30/05 =======================
(Thursday, 30 June)
Late Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda [=================================
(Friday, 10 June)
Regrets: Agenda: 2 June 2005
(Thursday, 2 June)
Re: Agenda: 26 May 2005 =========================
(Thursday, 26 May)
Late regrets for 28 April 2005 call
(Friday, 29 April)
Regrets: Agenda (updated) for Thursday 21 April
(Thursday, 21 April)
Matt May
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Saturday, 18 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: 2 levels or 3
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: Validation as test for basic accessibility
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: 3.1: Action item re foreign passages
(Tuesday, 7 June)
Level 3
(Monday, 6 June)
Re: Requiring ATAG conformance
(Monday, 2 May)
Maurizio Boscarol
Re: Validation: what criteria in L1, L2 or L3?...
(Thursday, 23 June)
Validation: what criteria in L1, L2 or L3?...
(Thursday, 23 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: R: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Sunday, 19 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Saturday, 18 June)
Michael Cooper
Proposed ednote to clarify captions and transcript
(Thursday, 23 June)
Need 1.1 L1 SC basic requirement to provide text alternative
(Thursday, 23 June)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 22 June 2005
(Tuesday, 21 June)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 08 June 2005
(Tuesday, 7 June)
Agenda for Techniques portion of Face to Face, 15 - 16 June 2005
(Tuesday, 7 June)
[techs] Minutes for 01 June Techniques teleconference
(Wednesday, 1 June)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 01 June 2005
(Tuesday, 31 May)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 25 May 2005
(Tuesday, 24 May)
RE: addition proposal, GL 4.2
(Wednesday, 18 May)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 18 May 2005
(Tuesday, 17 May)
[techs] Minutes of 11 May 2005 Techniques teleconference
(Wednesday, 11 May)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 11 May 2005
(Tuesday, 10 May)
RE: working definition of baseline
(Tuesday, 10 May)
RE: RE: working definition of baseline
(Tuesday, 10 May)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 04 May 2005
(Tuesday, 3 May)
[techs] requirements updated
(Tuesday, 3 May)
[techs] Please review issue summaries
(Tuesday, 3 May)
[techs] Review of techniques issues for Guideline 2.4
(Monday, 2 May)
[techs] Changes in requirements doc
(Wednesday, 27 April)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 27 April 2005
(Tuesday, 26 April)
[techs] Updated requirements for techniques and checklists
(Tuesday, 26 April)
[techs] Techniques for Guideline 4.2
(Tuesday, 26 April)
[techs] Techniques for Guideline 2.4
(Tuesday, 26 April)
[techs] Techniques for Guideline 1.3
(Tuesday, 26 April)
[techs] Techniques for Guideline 1.1
(Tuesday, 26 April)
[techs] minutes from April 20 telecon
(Thursday, 21 April)
[techs] Techniques Teleconference 06 April 2005
(Tuesday, 5 April)
Analysis, impact of externalized baseline decision on techniques
(Tuesday, 5 April)
Mike Barta
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)]
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)]
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
RE: Bare-bones proposal for 1.3, "Ensure that information,
(Friday, 13 May)
RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
RE: Unicode encodings
(Thursday, 28 April)
RE: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes
(Friday, 1 April)
RE: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes
(Friday, 1 April)
Neil Soiffer
Regrets: Agenda: 12 May 2005
(Thursday, 12 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Wednesday, 11 May)
Regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005
(Thursday, 5 May)
Re: Agenda: 21 April 2005
(Thursday, 21 April)
Re: Agenda: Thursday 14 April
(Wednesday, 13 April)
Regrets: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005
(Thursday, 7 April)
Neil Whiteley
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
(Tuesday, 21 June)
RE: WARNING: Yet another virus sent by 'Wendy'
(Sunday, 10 April)
RE: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes
(Friday, 1 April)
Richard Ishida
RE: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary)
(Friday, 22 April)
RE: Thinking aloud...Definitions (pre-Guideline 1.1 summary)
(Wednesday, 20 April)
Roberto Castaldo
Regrets: Agenda 6/30/05
(Thursday, 30 June)
Regrets: Agenda: 23 June Telecon
(Thursday, 23 June)
R: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Thursday, 23 June)
R: R: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Tuesday, 21 June)
R: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Monday, 20 June)
R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Sunday, 19 June)
R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Sunday, 19 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Friday, 17 June)
Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Thursday, 16 June)
Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda [=================================
(Friday, 10 June)
Regrets: Agenda: 2 June 2005
(Friday, 3 June)
Regrets: Agenda 19 May 2005
(Thursday, 19 May)
Regrets: Agenda: 12 May 2005
(Thursday, 12 May)
Regrets: Agenda: 28 April 2005
(Thursday, 28 April)
Late regrets: Agenda for Thursday 21 April
(Friday, 22 April)
Regrets: Agenda: Thursday 14 April
(Thursday, 14 April)
Regrets: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005
(Thursday, 7 April)
Roberto Ellero
regrets, Agenda 6/30/05
(Thursday, 30 June)
regrets: Agenda: 26 May 2005
(Thursday, 26 May)
Regrets for today's call (05/19)
(Thursday, 19 May)
Late regrets: Agenda: 12 May 2005
(Friday, 13 May)
regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005
(Thursday, 5 May)
regrets: Agenda: 28 April 2005
(Thursday, 28 April)
regrets: Agenda Thursday 14 April
(Thursday, 14 April)
regrets: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005
(Thursday, 7 April)
Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
Regrets: Agenda 6/30/05 =======================
(Thursday, 30 June)
RE: remove validity completely?
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
(Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: test
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Tuesday, 21 June)
RE: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: R: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Monday, 20 June)
RE: HTML/XHTML, mime-types, Strict & Transitional [was Re: Semantics]
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Semantics [was: Re: Well-formed (was: Re: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates)]
(Monday, 20 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Sunday, 19 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Saturday, 18 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Saturday, 18 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Saturday, 18 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: Re : Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Friday, 17 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Thursday, 16 June)
RE: F2F Proposed Resolutions Draft Updates
(Thursday, 16 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: About tests 37-41 (headers)
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Wednesday, 15 June)
RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
(Tuesday, 14 June)
RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Tuesday, 14 June)
Regrets: Agenda: 26 May 2005
(Thursday, 26 May)
Re: WARNING: Yet another virus sent by 'Wendy'
(Sunday, 10 April)
Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
R: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Tuesday, 14 June)
Regrets: 9 June 2005 Agenda (for Luca Mascaro)
(Thursday, 9 June)
Regrets for this evening (R. Scano and L. Mascaro)
(Thursday, 19 May)
Re: addition proposal, GL 4.2
(Thursday, 19 May)
Re: RE: working definition of baseline
(Friday, 6 May)
Regrets: Agenda with updated links: 5 May 2005
(Thursday, 5 May)
Triple Regrets: Agenda (updated) for Thursday 21 April
(Thursday, 21 April)
Re: Agenda: Thursday 14 April
(Thursday, 14 April)
Re: HTML Techniques16.1, 10.6 baseline Discussion
(Wednesday, 13 April)
Re: Unifying ATAG and UAAG in 4.2 (or surrogate)
(Friday, 8 April)
Re: Definition of "baseline"
(Thursday, 7 April)
Re: Definition of "baseline"
(Thursday, 7 April)
Regrets: AGENDA for Thursday 7 April 2005
(Wednesday, 6 April)
Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC
RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Wednesday, 15 June)
RE: Re-post: Influence of valid code on screen readers
(Tuesday, 14 June)
Sailesh Panchang
♦Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)
(Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: Implications of proposed baseline definitions
(Wednesday, 11 May)
Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
06/30 call
(Thursday, 30 June)
regrets for today's call (06/23)
(Thursday, 23 June)
Re : Influence of valid code (generically)
(Friday, 17 June)
regrets for today's call
(Thursday, 2 June)
Re: Agenda: 26 May 2005 ======================