W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

RE: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:06:49 -0500
To: "'Gez Lemon'" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20050622150649.DFE5C60C15B@m18.spamarrest.com>

Yes - if you post it to the list tonight the working group will most
certainly read it before our meeting tomorrow. 
 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Gez Lemon
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 2:39 AM
> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: perhaps remove the requirement for validity completely!
> 
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> On 22/06/05, John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu> wrote:
> > The only "foregone conclusion" is that we will publish a new public
> > working draft on 30 June.
> 
> It seems I may have read too much into the "we". I can't make the
> Thursday teleconference, but would like to make a case for my position
> on validity. If I put together a summary of my concerns in relation to
> the rationale from the face-to-face, and send it this evening when I
> get back from work, could it be considered at the teleconference
> tomorrow?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Gez
> 
> --
> _____________________________
> Supplement your vitamins
> http://juicystudio.com
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:06:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:37 UTC