W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: RE: working definition of baseline

From: 'Jason White' <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:24:45 +1000
To: "'Web Content Guidelines'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050511012445.GA5554@jdc>

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:10:53PM -0500, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
> Good point Michael,
Agreed.
> 
> But i think that it should also not be constrained to 'claims'.  Baselines
> are good for evaluation even when you don't make a claim.
> 
> So - how do we write it without evaluation or claim.
> 

<propose>
Any minimum set of technologies assumed to be supported by, and enabled 
in, user agents in order for Web content to conform to these guidelines.
</propose>
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2005 01:25:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:37 UTC