W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)

From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:54:44 +0000 (UTC)
To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0506201653470.15178@aristotle.multipattern.com> 

Matt May wrote:

> You've completely missed the other half of the problem, which is that we 
> can find many examples of valid pages that are plenty inaccessible.

That is an unsupported claim. Nobody has provided even the standard three 
*real-world* examples that I repeatedly call for and never get.

-- 

     Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
     Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
       --This.
       --What's wrong with top-posting?
Received on Monday, 20 June 2005 16:54:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 02:51:21 GMT