W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:54:01 +0200
To: <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>, <mcmay@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200506151451578.SM02832@Inbox>

Fully agree.
Also my opinion is also of IWA/HWG, that at now is the largest web professional association worldwide. We are starting a restyling of all our web site for code conformance, and we will involve web professional to follow us.
Did w3c will explain to them: no need of conform code? And what think about this html working group?

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Ineke van der Maat"<inekemaa@xs4all.nl>
    Inviato: 15/06/05 20.08.42
    A: "Matt May"<mcmay@w3.org>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Oggetto: Re: summary of resolutions from last 2 days
    
    
    Hello Matt,
    
    You wrote:
    >In fact, even among the more enlightened developers, it's hard to find one 
    >who hasn't had a client who made them do something that broke HTML 
    >validity.
    
    Who does have  the skills?  My clients are always saying: you have learnt 
    for it.. so you know how to build our websites.
    
    Do you also tell your baker how to bake the bread?
    
    In the html book (html bible)  I have, I can read about valid websites and 
    also about accessibility. The designers you write about, have simply the 
    wrong books or  had/have the wrong teacher.
    
    Greetings
    Ineke van der Maat
    
    
    
    
    

[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2005 18:54:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:37 UTC