W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

XHTML 1.1 as text/html (was Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?)

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:45:08 +0100
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050622224508.GB19600@us-lot.org>

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:18:57PM +0100, Neil Whiteley wrote:

> A lot depends on your interpretation of the document you refer to and
> specifically the meaning of *SHOULD NOT* used in the summaries table.

What good reason is there for serving XHTML 1.1 as text/html? What
advantages does it give you over Appendix C conformant XHTML 1.0
served as text/html?

-- 
David Dorward                                      http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 22:45:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:37 UTC