- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:45:08 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:18:57PM +0100, Neil Whiteley wrote: > A lot depends on your interpretation of the document you refer to and > specifically the meaning of *SHOULD NOT* used in the summaries table. What good reason is there for serving XHTML 1.1 as text/html? What advantages does it give you over Appendix C conformant XHTML 1.0 served as text/html? -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 22:45:13 UTC