- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 22:22:10 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Meeting Information Time: 20:00 UTC, 6 AM Eastern Australia, 10 PM France, 4 PM Boston Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 Passcode: 9224# IRC: irc.w3.org port: 6665 channel #wai-wcag <announcement> **Introducing a new procedure** We are looking for a better way to compile and keep track of responses to the proposals being submitted for review. The links listed under agenda items 3-5 will take you to forms where you can register your responses to the details of the proposal. For each guideline or success criterion proposed , the form will present the proposed wording followed by two radio buttons and a textarea. The first radio button is labled "Proposed wording is better than current wording." The second radio button is labeled "Current wording is better than proposed wording." The textarea is labeled "Qualifications, comments, alternative proposals." This should allow you to indicate whether or not the proposal is an improvement upon the current wording (i.e., the wording in the current Internal Working Draft). Either way, you may provide a rationale or other comment, or you can propose alternative wording for the group to consider. We hope this will make it easier for us to focus in on places where there are disagreements that have to be resolved, instead of spending time on less important issues where there seems to be general agreement. The results will be compiled and reviewed prior to the Thursday call. Discussion on the call will then center on areas of substantive disagreement. In cases where there is substantial but not universal agreement, dissenting views will also be brought to the attention of the Working Group and discussed, in hope of reaching consensus. ***Please complete the surveys no later than 2 hours before the call, so that we have time to compile the results. Thanks very much!*** </announcement> Agenda 1. Agenda review and face to face announcements (5 minutes) 2. Techniques Task Force update (5 minutes) 3. GL 2.5 (25 minutes): discuss responses to remaining issues/proposals. a. To review these proposals and register your response(s), please complete the survey at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/minerror0517/ b. See also Andi's update at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0510.html 4. GL 4.2 (25 minutes): discuss feedback on proposals re: conformance and new success criterion. a. To review these proposals and register your response(s), please complete the survey at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/techsupport0516/ 5. GL 3.1 (25 minutes): discuss responses to proposed revision of GL 3.1 a. To review the proposal and register your response(s), please complete the survey at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/meaning0516/ 6. Wrap-up and look ahead to next week's agenda "Good design is accessible design." Dr. John M. Slatin, Director Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2005 03:22:16 UTC