W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

RE: Agenda + Announcement: 19 May 2005

From: Yvette Hoitink <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 20:59:08 +0200
To: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1DYqEk-0003rR-3w@lisa.w3.org>

Hello everyone,

I've still got the flu, so I won't be attending tonight. I did fill out the
questionnaire.

Yvette Hoitink
Heritas, Enschede, the Netherlands
E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl
WWW: http://www.heritas.nl 

> 
> Meeting Information
> Time: 20:00 UTC, 6 AM Eastern Australia, 10 PM France, 4 PM Boston
> Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 Passcode: 9224#
> IRC: irc.w3.org port: 6665 channel #wai-wcag 
> 
> <announcement>
> **Introducing a new procedure**
> We are looking for a better way to compile and keep track of 
> responses to the proposals being submitted for review.
> 
> The links listed under agenda items 3-5  will take you to 
> forms where you can register your responses to the details of 
> the proposal.  For each guideline or  success criterion 
> proposed , the form will present the proposed wording 
> followed by two radio buttons and a textarea.  
> 
> The first radio button is labled "Proposed wording is better 
> than current wording." The second radio button is labeled 
> "Current wording is better than proposed wording." The 
> textarea is labeled "Qualifications, comments, alternative proposals."
> 
> This should allow you to indicate whether or not the proposal 
> is an improvement upon the current wording (i.e., the wording 
> in the current Internal Working Draft).  Either way, you may 
> provide a rationale or other comment, or you can propose 
> alternative wording for the group to consider.
> 
> We hope this will make it easier for us to focus in on places 
> where there are disagreements that have to be resolved, 
> instead of spending time on less important issues where there 
> seems to be general agreement.
> The results will be compiled and reviewed prior to the Thursday call.
> Discussion on the call will then center on areas of 
> substantive disagreement.
> 
> In cases where there is substantial but not universal 
> agreement, dissenting views will also be brought to the 
> attention of the Working Group and discussed, in hope of 
> reaching consensus.
> 
> ***Please complete the surveys no later than  2 hours before 
> the call, so that we have time to compile the results.  
> Thanks very much!*** </announcement>
> 
> Agenda
> 1.	Agenda review and face to face announcements (5 minutes)
> 2.	Techniques Task Force update (5 minutes)
> 3.	GL 2.5 (25 minutes):  discuss responses to remaining
> issues/proposals.
> a.	To review these proposals and register your response(s), please
> complete the survey at 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/minerror0517/
> b.	See also Andi's update at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0510.html 
> 4.	GL 4.2 (25 minutes):  discuss feedback on proposals re:
> conformance and new success criterion.
> a.	To review these proposals and register your response(s), please
> complete the survey at
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/techsupport0516/
>   
> 5.	GL 3.1 (25 minutes):  discuss responses to proposed revision of
> GL 3.1
> a.	To review the proposal and register your response(s), please
> complete the survey at 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/meaning0516/ 
> 6. Wrap-up and look ahead to next week's agenda		
> 
> 
> 
> "Good design is accessible design."
> 
> Dr. John M. Slatin, Director
> Accessibility Institute
> University of Texas at Austin
> FAC 248C
> 1 University Station G9600
> Austin, TX 78712
> ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524
> email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
> Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2005 18:59:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:37 UTC