- From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:44:53 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 20/06/05, Maurizio Boscarol <maurizio@usabile.it> wrote: > faster and ram costing less, I can't see a reason for browser to not try > to correct little code errors. But this is a sort of religious argument, > I know. What's a little code error? With the permutations of possible "little" errors, little ends up becoming very significant. Significant to the point that some vendors have decided not to attempt it, and ride on the back of a user-agent that is prepared to attempt it. Best regards, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Monday, 20 June 2005 21:45:00 UTC