> A few posts ago I suggested that perhaps an answer to the P1 vs P2 debate > would be to remove WCAG reference to validity completely. And it's one of those terrible ideas from a preferred person that I fear will be unkillable. * We already have a requirement in WCAG 1. * We already have it in WCAG 2, even. The issue is where it goes. * Nobody seriously believes there should be no requirement under any guise whatsoever. * We seem to be offloading a lot onto other guidelines. Can't we be explicit about this one? -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> --This. --What's wrong with top-posting?Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 22:17:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:38 GMT