- From: Neil Whiteley <neil.whiteley@tag2.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:42:15 +0100
- To: "'Jason White'" <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Jason, <Jason> To the contrary, you could take one of the HTML 4 DTD's, add the extensions and validate against it. You wouldn't even have to publish it in order to meet a validity requirement; you would just have to create it and then validate the document instances. </Jason> I'm not sure that I see the need to meet validity requirements via the back door when XHTML (in whatever flavour) is available legitimately. Besides which, WCAG 1.0[1] states *published* formal grammars as the requirement. I don't see the same in the draft of WCAG 2.0[2] but I'm sure that this must be an *oversight* that will be fixed in the next draft!!!! [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/wai-pageauth.html#tech-identify-grammar [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#use-spec Regards Neil Whiteley Tag2
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 23:42:22 UTC