W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Agenda: 23 June Telecon

From: <lguarino@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:33:07 -0700
To: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-id: <2f71502f533e.2f533e2f7150@adobe.com>

I'll be half an hour late.
Loretta

----- Original Message -----
From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 8:21 pm
Subject: Agenda: 23 June Telecon

> 
> Note:
> We will again be starting one hour earlier than usual.
> Meeting Information
> 1900 UTC 0500 Eastern Australia 1500  North American Eastern 1200
> Pacific 1900 Central Europe
> Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 Passcode 9224#
> IRC server: irc.w3.org port : 6665 channel : #wai-wcag
> 
> 
> Goal of meeting: 
> Review proposals from Brussels meeting and approve publication of 
> PublicWorking Draft on 30 June
> 
> Prior to the call:
> 1.	Please review the 16 June Editor's Draft at
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2005/06/f2f-proposed-resolutions-draft.html.
> This draft includes more than 50 changes agreed upon by 
> participants in
> the Brussels meeting through noon on Thursday, 16 June. Changes 
> includenew guideline text, new wording for success criteria, 
> deletion of some
> success criteria, and changes in levels to which success criteria are
> assigned.  New definitions for important terms such as text 
> alternative,non-text content, and others are also included. This 
> draft does not
> include proposed wording for several guidelines which were 
> discussed on
> Thursday afternoon, after several participants had had to leave; 
those
> proposals are available in the survey  listed below. 
> a.	Please send your comments about the Editor's Draft to the list
> *before* the call. These comments will help us focus discussion 
during
> the call. They will also help us craft Editorial Notes describing
> unresolved issues for inclusion in the draft. Editorial Notes 
> frame the
> issues and encourage more targeted feedback from reviewers.
> 
> Please complete the survey for the remaining proposals from the 
> Brusselsmeeting.  The survey is available at
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/misc0621/
> 2.	The survey focuses on specific success criteria within the
> following guidelines:
> 
> a.	GL 1.2
> b.	GL 2.3
> c.	GL 2.4
> d.	GL 4.2
> e.	Number of conformance levels
> 3.	The call will result in the text of the new Public Working 
Draft
> that we will publish on June 30. The new public draft will also 
> includeEditorial Notes describing issues for which the Working 
> Group has not
> yet achieved resolution. These Editorial Notes will inform the Web
> community about possible directions we are considering, and request
> comments and suggestions from reviewers.
> 
> Agenda
> 1.	Agenda overview (5 minutes)
> 2.	Techniques Task Fore (5 minutes)
> 3.	Review results of surveys listed above (50 minutes):
> a.	Accept or reject proposed wording
> b.	Identify unresolved issues to be described in Editorial Notes
> included in the new Public Working Draft
> 4.	Review of Editor's Draft (90 minutes)
> a.	Accept or reject proposed wording for inclusion in Public
> Working Draft
> b.	Identify issues that should be described in Editorial Notes and
> included in Public Working Draft
> 5.	Informative content: (30 minutes)
> a.	Determine what informative content should be published in
> support of new Public Working Draft
> i.	Introduction (informative section of Guidelines doc)
> ii.	Client-side Scripting Techniques
> iii.	HTML and XHTML Techniques
> iv.	CSS Techniques
> v.	Checklist
> vi.	Guide doc
> 	
> 
> 
> "Good design is accessible design."
> 
> Dr. John M. Slatin, Director 
> Accessibility Institute
> University of Texas at Austin 
> FAC 248C 
> 1 University Station G9600 
> Austin, TX 78712 
> ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 
> email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu 
> Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 22:33:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:37 UTC