W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?

From: Bailey, Bruce <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 07:36:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CCDBDCBFA650F74AA88830D4BACDBAB50AED27BF@wdcrobe2m02.ed.gov>
To: <joeclark@joeclark.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

I read the minutes.  I saw your name on the participant list.  Very disappointing on the 3 vs 2 levels.  It is my expectation that rationality will prevail and there will be only two levels at end.  Did the whole business of validity as P1 vs P2 not come up at all???
Thanks.
-- 
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld.  Pls 4giv shrt hnd, tyops, and mispellings.

Received on Sunday, 26 June 2005 11:36:48 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Joe Clark: "Web Standards Project Accessibility Task Force"
Previous message: Yvette Hoitink: "RE: Proposed ednote to clarify captions and transcript"
Maybe in reply to: David Dorward: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2?"
Next in thread: Matt May: "Re: Should validity be P1 or P2? (was RE: summary of resolutions from last 2 days)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:38 GMT