W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Proposed planning framework

From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:03:06 +0200
Message-ID: <42661ACA.3000009@ubaccess.com>
To: wendy@w3.org
CC: wai-gl <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Please not passover starts end of this week and it lasts a week.

so this will not be a good time



Wendy Chisholm wrote:

>
> This message outlines a possible framework for planning discussion of 
> issues related to each of the guidelines. I've also included a 
> detailed example of the framework applied to tasks for the next few 
> weeks.
> Basic framework:
>
> week 1 -
>  tuesday (mailing list): issue summary and proposals related to 3 
> guidelines and their success criteria.
>  thursday (telecon): raise issues with proposals, close as many issues 
> as can
> week 2 -
>  tuesday (mailing list): updated summaries for 3 guidelines and their 
> success criteria
>  thursday (telecon): close issues for 3 guidelines and their success 
> criteria
> week 3 -
>  monday (mailing list): proposals for techniques and test cases 
> related to the 3 guidelines and their success criteria closed the 
> previous thursday.
>  wednesday (telecon): raise issues with proposals, close as many 
> issues as can
>  (meanwhile - tuesday/thursday ala week 1 for the next set of 3 
> guidelines)
> week 4 -
>  monday (mailing list): updated proposals for techniques and test 
> cases for the 3 guidelines
>  wednesday (telecon): close issues for techniques and test cases for 3 
> guidelines
>  (meanwhile - tuesday/thursday ala week 2)
>
> An example of how this would look (G: = actions related to thursday 
> telecons, T: = actions related to wednesday telecons).
> NOTE: This is to demonstrate how we could stagger the work and not 
> necessarily the order we will proceed in the next few weeks. This is a 
> proposal for discussion. We also will need to coordinate with people 
> who have taken action items to determine when they are available to do 
> what.
>
> week 1  18-Apr       Tuesday: G: (mailing list) issue summaries and 
> proposals for guidelines 1.1, 1.3, 2.4, 4.2
> Wednesday: T: (telecon) Plan for addressing techniques and test suites 
> for 1.1, 1.3, 2.4, 4.2
> Thursday:  G: (telecon) raise issues with summaries/proposals for 1.1, 
> 1.3, 2.4, 4.2
>
> week 2  25-Apr       Tuesday: G: (mailing list) updated summaries and 
> proposals for guidelines 1.1, 1.3, 2.4, 4.2  Wednesday: T: (telecon) 
> [unsure]
> Thursday: G: (telecon) close issues with guidelines 1.1, 1.3, 2.4, 4.2
> Friday: WCAG 2.0 Internal WD with: guidelines 1.1, 1.3, 2.4, 4.2
>
> week 3  2-May   Monday: T: (mailing list) issue summaries and 
> proposals for HTML, CSS, and scripting techniques and tests for 1.1, 
> 1.3, 2.4, 4.2 to the mailing list   Tuesday: G: (mailing list) issue 
> summaries and proposals for guidelines 2.3, 2.5, 3.1, 
> presentation/structure   Wednesday: T: (telecon) raise issues with 
> HTML, CSS, scripting techniques and tests for 1.1, 1.3, 2.4, 4.2  
> Thursday: G: (telecon) raises issues with summaries/proposals 2.3, 
> 2.5, 3.1 
> week 4    9-May   Monday: T: (mailing list) updated summaries and 
> proposals for HTML, CSS, and scripting techniques and tests for 1.1, 
> 1.3, 2.4, 4.2 to the mailing list   Tuesday: G: (mailing list) updated 
> summaries and proposals for guidelines 2.3, 2.5, 3.1  Wednesday: T: 
> (telecon) close issues with HTML, CSS, scripting techniques and tests 
> for 1.1, 1.3, 2.4, 4.2  Thursday: G: (telecon) close issues with 
> guidelines 2.3, 2.5, 3.1  Friday: WCAG 2.0 Internal WD with 
> guidelines: 2.3, 2.5, 3.1
>
> Thanks to Andi, Marnie (IBM), Gregg, John, Mike, and Judy for helping 
> with the plan.  We are playing with a variety of scenarios based on 
> this framework to see how and when we can aim to get WCAG 2.0 to 
> Recommendation.
>
> Best,
> --wendy
>
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2005 08:03:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:36 UTC