W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

[2.4] Issue summary

From: Yvette Hoitink <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:27:10 +0200
To: "'WAI GL \(E-mail\)'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1DnvKE-0001qB-GQ@maggie.w3.org>

Issue summary for guideline 2.4

1. Issues that are closed
Issue 1387 [http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1387] can be
closed because the original poster thought it was a problem that the current
phrasing covers search functions as well, which is exactly what we want. I
propose to explain this to the original poster and close this issue.

Issue 1388 [http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1388] was
addressed by the proposal for guideline 2.4 level 1 success criterion 1
adopted at the 9 June 2005 meeting
[http://www.w3.org/2005/06/09-wai-wcag-minutes.html]. This new proposal
removes the overlap with 1.3 which was the original concern.

Issue 1389 [http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1389] was
addressed by deleting guideline 2.4 level 2 success criterion 1 (Documents
that have five or more section headings and are presented as a single
delivery unit include a table of contents with links to important sections
of the document) as decided at the 9 June 2005 meeting
[http://www.w3.org/2005/06/09-wai-wcag-minutes.html]. This removes the word
'document' from guideline 2.4 which the original poster found unclear.

2. Issues that seem to be closed, but may need clarification 
Issue 1132 [http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1132] may be
addressed by the proposal for guideline 3.1 level 3 SC 5 adopted at the June
14, 2005 meeting in Brussels
[http://www.w3.org/2005/06/14-wai-wcag-minutes.html]. Unsure because this
only addresses a part of the concern of the original poster. The notion of
progressive complexity is not covered by the current proposal. I feel this
belongs in the guide for either 2.4 or 3.1. I think this issue can be closed
once it is incorporated there.

3. Issues that are not addressed in current draft
Issue 955 [http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=955] is not
addressed by the current proposal. However, I feel providing information
about presentation modes belongs in the techniques documents so this issue
can be closed once this has been incorporated into techniques. I will submit
this as a technique.

Yvette Hoitink
Heritas, Enschede, the Netherlands
E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl
WWW: http://www.heritas.nl 
 
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2005 09:27:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:37 UTC