W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2005

RE: Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques

From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:53:14 +1000
Message-ID: <16980.30314.171445.433323@jdc.local>
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Gregg Vanderheiden writes:
 > 
 > Hi Jason,
 > 
 >     I follow your email - but not your intro.

Sorry Gregg, I misread your original message when replying. This is
the hazard of responding to e-mail when one isn't concentrating
properly, I suppose.

You are right: we are describing baselines but not mandating any.

Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 23:54:00 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jason White: "Definition of "baseline""
Previous message: Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG): "Regrets for Thursday 7 April 2005 conference"
In reply to: Gregg Vanderheiden: "RE: Conformance claims, 4.2, and techniques"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:37 GMT