Saturday, 31 March 2007
- Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: RichTextInput03
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: Adding attributes to elements Generically (was Let every element have a src attribute)
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Design Principles Document update
 - Re: E-mail subscription and RSS
 - Re: Posting to this list
 
Friday, 30 March 2007
Saturday, 31 March 2007
- Re: Versioning information
 - "HTML Email" W3C Workshop
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Versioning information (was: Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5)
 - Comments on XForms Transitional
 - Re: Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
 
Friday, 30 March 2007
- Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Current Status related to WHATWG (was Multipart response support and other new features)
 - Re: Scope of this group
 - RE: Brainstorming: more structured form submissions
 - Re: Design Principles Document update
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Design Principles Document update
 - Re: Posting to this list (handling duplicates)
 - Re: Posting to this list (handling duplicates)
 - Re: Scope of this group
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Scope of this group
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: FW:Re: Multipart response support
 - FW:Re: Multipart response support
 - RE:Re: Multipart response support
 - Current Status related to WHATWG (was Multipart response support and other new features)
 - Re: Design Principles Document update
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Metadata Authoring Capabilities
 - Re: Metadata Authoring Capabilities
 - Metadata Authoring Capabilities
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: Design Principles Document update
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - apologies for multiple posts of identical message
 - Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
 - Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
 - Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
 - Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
 - Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
 - Re: Design Principles Document update
 - Re: Brainstorming: more structured form submissions
 - Re: Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
 
Thursday, 29 March 2007
- Brainstorming: more structured form submissions
 - RE:Re: Multipart response support
 - RE:Re: RichTextInput03
 
Friday, 30 March 2007
- Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
 - Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
 - Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG
 - Microsoft's involvement in the WG
 - Re: Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
 - Re: Design Principles Document update
 - Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback
 
Thursday, 29 March 2007
- Re: Use Visible Metadata was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Multipart response support (and other new features)
 - Re: Use Visible Metadata was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Design Principles Document update
 - Re: Design Principles Document update
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Design Principles Document update
 - Design Principles Document update
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
 - Re: RichTextInput03
 - Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
 - Re: Let every element have a src attribute
 - Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: VisibleMetadata
 - Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback
 - Re: RichTextInput03
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Let every element have a src attribute
 - Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
 - Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
 - Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
 - Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
 - Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
 - Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: <video> element feedback
 - Re: RichTextInput03
 - Re: <video> element feedback
 - Re: <video> element feedback
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - AbbrAcronym01: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
 - Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
 - Adding attributes to elements Generically (was Let every element have a src attribute)
 - Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: RichTextInput03
 - <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms
 - Re: Let every element have a src attribute
 
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
- Re: Multipart response support
 - Let every element have a src attribute
 - Re: <video> element feedback
 - Re: <video> element feedback
 - Re: Glossary of English Terms
 - Re: RichTextInput03
 - Re: RichTextInput03
 - Glossary of English Terms
 - Re: RichTextInput03
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
 - Use Visible Metadata was Re: Design Principles
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - more clear survey announcements [was: let's have an HTML WG teleconference ...]
 - Re: cancel. Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: cancel. Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - cancel. Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: VisibleMetadata
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: VisibleMetadata
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: VisibleMetadata
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: Multipart response support
 - Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
 - Multipart response support
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: VisibleMetadata
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
- Re: wow...
 - Re: DocType02: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: SPAM-LOW: story telling and test cases
 - Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
 
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
- Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: VisibleMetadata
 - Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
 - Re: story telling and test cases
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: RichTextInput03
 - Re: WG Process
 - Re: MostlySemanticMarkup
 - WG Process (was: Re: wow...)
 
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
- Re: VisibleMetadata
 - MostlySemanticMarkup
 - Re: wow...
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
- Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
 - Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 - Re: RichTextInput03
 - update from Chris Wilson on Microsoft's status
 - Re: RichTextInput03
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: Proposed Design Principles
 - Proposed Design Principles
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: XML input control
 - RE: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: story telling and test cases
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Test case, XML input control
 - RE: People's Location in the HTML WG
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - RE: declarative expressons in WF2
 - RE: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - People's Location in the HTML WG
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - story telling and test cases
 - Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: wow...
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - RichTextInput03: Rich text input control (was: XML input control)
 - DocType02: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - AbbrAcronym01: Was Deprecate <acronym>
 - RE: XML input control
 - RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 
Monday, 26 March 2007
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Fwd: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML
 
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
Monday, 26 March 2007
- Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: wow...
 
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
- RE: Brainstorming: Best of All Worlds
 - changing the email address connected to your HTML WG membership [was: Hello everybody]
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Rich text input control (was: XML input control)
 
Monday, 26 March 2007
- RE: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Rich text input control (was: XML input control)
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - RE: declarative expressons in WF2
 - RE: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Printing a review copy of Web Apps 1.0
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: HTML should be replaced by Flash
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - RE: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 - Re: pronunciation and other guides RE: Deprecate <accronym>
 - RE: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: wow...
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - RE: XML input control
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: XML input control
 - HTML should be replaced by Flash
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: W3C tools
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?)
 - Re: W3C tools
 - Re: W3C tools
 - Re: wow...
 - wow...
 - RE: W3C tools Re: Named & Numbered Issues was: Leading ... IRC
 - RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading theForefront - with IRC ! ?)
 - RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - Re: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?)
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?)
 - Re: brainstorming -- SVG -- SMIL-like declarations in HTML
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - RE: brainstorming -- SVG -- SMIL-like declarations in HTML
 - Re: W3C tools
 
Sunday, 25 March 2007
- Re: W3C tools
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - RE: declarative expressons in WF2
 - W3C tools Re: Named & Numbered Issues was: Leading ... IRC
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - RE: alternative guides to content (semantic, visual, but not pronunciation)
 - Re: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?)
 - RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?)
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: WF2 step attribute
 - Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 - Re: WF2 step attribute
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - RE: brainstorming -- SVG
 - Re: pronunciation and other guides RE: Deprecate <accronym>
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: WF2 step attribute
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - WF2 step attribute
 - Re: declarative expressons in WF2
 - declarative expressons in WF2
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - pronunciation and other guides RE: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - RE: brainstorming -- SVG
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 
Saturday, 24 March 2007
Sunday, 25 March 2007
Saturday, 24 March 2007
Sunday, 25 March 2007
Saturday, 24 March 2007
Sunday, 25 March 2007
- Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - RE: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 
Saturday, 24 March 2007
- Proposed requirement: don't break the Web
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 
Friday, 23 March 2007
- Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (fwd)
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 
Saturday, 24 March 2007
- let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: WorkGroup Funding - re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 
Friday, 23 March 2007
- Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Meeting at XTech (was: Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG)
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: brainstorming -- SVG
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (multi-site/video possibilities)
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: brainstorming -- SVG
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Deprecate <acronym>
 - Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 - RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: XML input control
 - Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - Re: No normative schema
 - Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?
 - No normative schema (was: Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG)
 - Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
 - Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Colours on the WG home page
 - Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
 - Re: brainstorming -- SVG
 - Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
 - Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 - RE: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
 - RE: brainstorming -- SVG
 - RE: Brainstorming - abbreviations -- usage statistics
 - brainstorming -- SVG
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
 - Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Colours on the WG home page
 
Thursday, 22 March 2007
- Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - presentation to IETF in Chicago July 22-27? [Fwd: new W3C HTML WG]
 - toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG
 - Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - XML input control
 - Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Straw man proposal to build an agenda/issue list
 - Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - RE: Colours on the WG home page
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds
 - Re: Colours on the WG home page
 - Straw man proposal to build an agenda/issue list
 - Re: HTML WG office hours in IRC, a few wiki topics
 - Re: HTML WG office hours in IRC, a few wiki topics
 - Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?
 
Wednesday, 21 March 2007
- Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Is HTML a final form medium like PDF?
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - WorkGroup Funding - re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments
 - Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: <video> element feedback
 - Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: <video> element feedback
 - Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments
 - Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
 - Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments
 - HTML WG office hours in IRC, a few wiki topics
 - Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
 - RE: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
 - Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
 - Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies
 - Re: <video> element feedback
 - Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments
 - preference for blocks of unrelated comments
 
Tuesday, 20 March 2007
- Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: <video> element feedback
 - Re: <video> element feedback
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Fwd: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Affiliation disclosure
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 
Monday, 19 March 2007
- Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: So, I am reading all these interesting threads...
 - Re: So, I am reading all these interesting threads...
 - So, I am reading all these interesting threads...
 - RE: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - IMG WIDTH/HEIGHT attributes (was: [whatwg] Video proposals)
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 
Sunday, 18 March 2007
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Fwd: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: WYSIWYM editors
 
Saturday, 17 March 2007
- Re: WYSIWYM editors
 - WYSIWYM editors
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 
Friday, 16 March 2007
- Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details?
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Colours on the WG home page
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - RE: Whoah There, Turbo
 
Thursday, 15 March 2007
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 
Friday, 16 March 2007
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - Re: [whatwg] Video proposals
 - HTML_WG.init() (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 
Thursday, 15 March 2007
- Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
 - Brainstorming - abbreviations
 - Re: Here's Web Forms 2.0 ...
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo (and market share threshold, and charter changes)
 - Re: Regarding the Patent Policy
 - Regarding the Patent Policy
 - Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo (and market share threshold, and charter changes)
 - Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
 - Re: Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
 - Re: HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details?
 - Re: HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details?
 - HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details?
 - Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy
 - RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 
Wednesday, 14 March 2007
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Best approach to research
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Hello everybody
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile
 
Tuesday, 13 March 2007
Wednesday, 14 March 2007
- Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 - face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG?
 
Tuesday, 13 March 2007
- Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc.
 - RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Hello, comments (was: Re: Whoah There, Turbo)
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Hello, comments (was: Re: Whoah There, Turbo)
 
Monday, 12 March 2007
- Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Whoah There, Turbo
 - Whoah There, Turbo
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ...
 - WG membership
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Posting to this list
 
Saturday, 10 March 2007
Friday, 9 March 2007
- Here's Web Forms 2.0 ...
 - Meet the HTML Working Group chairs in Austin at SxSWi (QA Weblog)
 - Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Posting to this list
 
Thursday, 8 March 2007
- Re: Posting to this list
 - Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?
 - Posting to this list
 - Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?
 - Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?
 - Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?
 - Re: [whatwg] call for participation: W3C HTML Working Group
 - call for participation: W3C HTML Working Group