- From: sajid saiyed <sajid.saiyed@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:53:05 +0530
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <6ba161e50703292223i25872e05v2f5b2acdf9b5cef3@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry, forgot to mail to the group: I think this discussion went from Metadata to XHTML1 and XHTML2 discussion. I didnt see any conclusions on Metadata. Do others still feel the need to carry the metadata discussion further, of it does not seem to add value? Regards Sajid On 3/30/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 17:28 +0900, Laurens Holst wrote: > > As on http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16 I seems you would like me to > > provide an example of an XHTML2 document that works in XHTML1: "Hunt 20 > > Mar 2007 <http://www.w3.org/mid/45FE99D1.4070906@lachy.id.au> takes > > issue with a number of XHTML 2 features; a reply from Holst makes a > > number of compatibility claims. It would be useful to see these > > subtantiated by test cases." > > > > Attached is a version of the XHTML2 document that is backing the > > frontpage of www.backbase.com (home.xml). This document is a perfectly > > valid XHTML2 document, as far as I can tell. > > Thanks for working out those details. > > Is this still about Simplifying Meta Data Profile? I think > I have lost track of some of the context. > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > > >
Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 05:23:10 UTC