- From: Joost de Valk <joost@joostdevalk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:56:53 +0100
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org, www-forms@w3.org
- Message-Id: <CBF5F032-9BEA-4CA7-8F39-A54954C99BF6@joostdevalk.nl>
consensus? Among 79 members? My god you're a positive man aren't you? :) Joost de Valk On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Dave Raggett wrote: > > Ian, > > Whilst we might end up at that starting point, it is very important > for consensus building to start from the use cases and assumptions > and to ensure that all participants have a shared vocabulary. That > might sound like wasted time to some, but experience shows that it > saves time in the long run. > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Ian Hickson wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Dave Raggett wrote: >>> >>> As a starting point, the Task Force would be expected to collect use >>> cases and assumptions, followed by work on the basic design >>> choices that >>> flow from them. >> >> Wouldn't a better starting point for a forms task force be to >> build on the >> work of the Web Application Formats working group? Art (the chair >> of that >> group) has already proposed that this group take over publication >> of their >> document, which is currently a W3C WD document. >> >> I would recommend that the forms task force continue this earlier >> W3C work >> and lead the document to Last Call. >> >> >>> Whilst it might seem easier to start from a detailed proposal and to >>> discuss tweaks to that, we are more likely to end up with a >>> concensus >>> across the wide variety of experience and opinions in the two >>> working >>> groups if we start by building a shared vocabulary and a common >>> grounding in the use cases and assumptions. >> >> To get from use cases to the proposal the WAF has suggested we >> work on >> took the better of three years of heavy work. Given that we have >> to reach >> REC by 2010 (according to our charter), which includes shipping >> "multiple >> independent complete and interoperable" "widely used" >> implementations, I >> humbly suggest that a more practical approach would be to start with >> something that already has native shipping experimental >> implementations in >> actual browsers, and which already has a spec nearly complete. >> >> I do not believe there is any way we could reach REC by 2010 if we >> started >> collecting _use cases_ today. >> >> -- >> Ian Hickson U+1047E ) >> \._.,--....,'``. fL >> http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _ >> \ ;`._ ,. >> Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'-- >> (,_..'`-.;.' >> > Joost de Valk @: joost@joostdevalk.nl W: http://www.joostdevalk.nl/ B: http://www.joostdevalk.nl/blog/
Received on Monday, 12 March 2007 17:58:04 UTC