- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:24:15 +0200
- To: "Dave Raggett" <dsr@w3.org>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <sebastian@dreamlab.net>, public-html@w3.org
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:17:54 +0200, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
> I have introduced a grammar for a subset of ECMA 262 r-value expressions
> together with additional constraints that ensure that the expressions
> can be statically analysed. See:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/03/XForms-Transitional/#expr-syntax
Note that functions must be side-effect free and avoid
introducing dependencies on form fields other than those
passed via the function's arguments. This is needed to
ensure that the expression can be statically analysed.
Doesn't help an implementor much. It seems you still haven't addressed the
original concern various people expressed either on this mailing list or
#html-wg.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 18:24:34 UTC