- From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <sebastian@dreamlab.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:34:39 +0100
- To: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <sebastian@dreamlab.net>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
expanding... based on discussion of #html-wg today. Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer schrieb: > > Yes, for example, to start with, specifically: > > - XForms Transitional [17:43] anne: what exactly does XForms Transitional address that HTML5 doesn't, etc. [...] [17:43] schnitz: anne, the expressions that Dave went to in his last mail? [17:44] Dave: also separation between presentation and value stored in DOM > - XHTML Modularization [17:52] anne: schnitz, if you're talking about just grouping some related elements that's already done [17:53] schnitz: anne, well, ok, but, I am generally asking the question, and thats my message, whether the work of this group will divide over time with the rest of W3C, or not [17:53] anne: i've no idea what that means [17:53] anne: HTML5 is compatible with the DOM, CSS specifications and is largely compatible with HTML4 and XHTML1 where these are compatible with the web... [17:53] schnitz: anne, so when you say grouping has been done, has it been done consistent with M12N for example? Can it be done? Does it make sense? Maybe? Should we? [17:53] anne: I don't think M12N makes sense [17:54] anne: (fwiw) [17:54] schnitz: anne, ok thats fine [17:54] schnitz: anne, still, its a valid question to ask [17:54] anne: (or the whole XHTML Mod stuff for that matter) [17:55] schnitz: its valid as a directional question, and of course we can dive away into details, but thats not the point, what I am saying here, being explicitly general, whether we have a chance, for the benefit of the overall W3C story, that those technologies grow together over time, or not [17:55] anne: i think it would be better if you reviewed HTML5 and said what would need to change in order for it to be more in line [17:55] schnitz: thats the next step [17:56] schnitz: first, this is brainstorming time, I would like to know whether the group feels at all whether this is a goal worth persueing [17:56] anne: having everyone agree into something from which it's not clear what the consequences are seems silly [17:57] anne much rather has concrete suggestions than architectural thoughts [17:57] Dave: surely thinks about how things could pan out makes sense and avoids walking blindfold into dead ends. [...] > - Sebastian > > Anne van Kesteren schrieb: >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:14:51 +0100, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer >> <sebastian@dreamlab.net> wrote: >>> I would like to kick start discussion on whether or not it is >>> beneficial to think in terms of Best of all Worlds, including HTML5, >>> Web Forms 2.0, XHTML 1.0, Modularization of XHTML, XHTML 2 and XForms. >> >> HTML5 (including Web Forms 2) has done that as much as possible, >> incorporating good ideas from XHTML2 / XForms, when possible. Do you >> have something concrete in mind? >> >> >> --Anne van Kesteren >> <http://annevankesteren.nl/> >> <http://www.opera.com/> > >
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:35:48 UTC