- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:38:26 +0900
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4609E332.3050206@students.cs.uu.nl>
Dan Connolly schreef: > p.s. I have seen some questions about the "+1" convention. > It comes from the apache project. Note in particular: > > in some cases a favourable vote carries the implied message 'I > approve *and* I'm willing to help.' > -- http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > as opposed to +0 for something like "fine by me as long as somebody > else does the work." > > I'd like to stick to that convention here. It's not at all clear > that a plain +1 message is worth distributing to hundreds of inboxes; > so try to say > > +1 and here's an example ... > or > +1 and here's a firefox/webkit patch ... > or > +1 and here's a bit of background research to support it ... > or > +1 and here's a tutorial weblog article I wrote ... > Yes, I have also seen it and been using it myself casually in discussions. I very much like it, so +1 from me :). Also, it makes the 278 new messages a little less daunting :). Plus, and I think this is a really big advantage, it immediately conveys the author’s opinion of the replied-to message, so you don’t have to scan the text anymore for it. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 03:39:19 UTC