- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:04:48 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ProposedDesignPrinciples I split the principles into Compatibility, Utility and Interoperability categories. I also added a Disputed Principles category for principles that have been disputed on this list. So far as I know, only "Visible Metadata" and "Mostly Semantic Markup" have been disputed. I did this so that if we adopt some of the principles in a more official way, we can just move the undisputed ones from "Proposed Design Principles" to "Design Principles", while continuing to discuss the remaining ones. I think the principles under dispute reflect some underlying fault lines in the web standards community. The "Visible Metadata" principle is favored by Microformats advocates (among others), but objected to by RDF / Semantic Web advocates. The "Mostly Semantic Markup" principle is favored by HTML advocates, but objected to by those who think you need XML/SGML to have "real" semantics. I think we will ultimately have to come to decisions on these issues. Remaining silent on them may be tempting, to give the appearance of a broader consensus, but these principles, or some opposite version, will be extremely relevant to specific design decisions. I'd like to hear if any of the other principles should be marked disputed (if you dispute one, please justify your objection, otherwise you are just contradicting, not disputing). Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 19:05:14 UTC