Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5

Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> serialization):
>> 1. Requiring <!DOCTYPE html>
>> 2. Allowing <!DOCTYPE html>
>> 3. Requiring either <!DOCTYPE html> or <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "...">
> The question is what do will less harm (I'm talking only about HTML
> I'd be OK with spec text that makes a given PUBLIC id conforming, says 
> that it doesn't map to any DTD, says that it exists for compatibility 
> with tools that can't produce a doctype without a public id and says 
> that those who don't suffer from such tool limitations should not 
> bother to use it.
+1 to that

Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 13:33:53 UTC