- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:50:08 +0900
- To: Robert Brodrecht <w3c@robertdot.org>
- CC: asbjorn@ulsberg.no, public-html@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 23:50:43 UTC
Robert Brodrecht schreef: >> I don't find the difference between abbreviations and acronym important >> enough to maintain it in a technical standard as HTML. Thus, I suggest >> both be replaced with a single element: >> >> <short> >> > > That's a fine idea. Basically, what you've done is thrown out both > specific meanings in favor of an equally easy to type element. You've > made it very generic, and not used a term that is already tied to a > specific grammatical idea. Both are "short versions of longer terms." If > this change were made, I'd have little to argue about. I could accept the > "short" tag. Yes, and it would not be backwards compatible with HTML4. That seems kind of unacceptable, especially given that we already have <abbr> for abbreviations. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 23:50:43 UTC