Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml?

• From: Andrés <adelfino@gmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:30:55 -0300
• To: public-html@w3.org
• Message-ID: <4d90013f0703081030p488a0ceax88c91cf0b675352c@mail.gmail.com>

I don't understand why the new version still refers to HTML, since it
is backwards incompatible. Is there any reason for this?

IMHO, a xhtml root element is more appropriate.

Greetings.

Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 18:31:16 UTC