- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 03:05:05 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On 22/03/2007 22:22, Dan Connolly wrote: > In this group, the participants don't sign up for weekly > teleconferences when we join the group, but as chair, I still > need some sort of regular sync point, so I'm likely > to do the IRC-office-hours thing periodically... maybe > every week, maybe every other week. I do intend to call > teleconferences some weeks. I might try that next week. I would like to be very clear that IRC cannot fully replace conf calls : during a one hour mandatory conf call as it happens in other WG, people present who don't object to decisions agree with them. Here, because of time shift, your IRC office hours have only little overlap with mine for instance, and I cannot consider I agree with something I just did not have the opportunity to discuss, only because your days are my nights... See the problem, I suppose ? IRC is easy to use, helpful, but that's only a tool for brainstorm if you don't use it as a 1 hour conf tool and I respectfully suggest we keep it far below the radar compared to the mailing-list. </Daniel>
Received on Friday, 23 March 2007 02:05:08 UTC