- From: Mike Schinkel <w3c-lists@mikeschinkel.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:26:11 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 00:32 -0400, Mike Schinkel wrote: > >> You will notice I created the first issue: >> >> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/AbbrAcronym01 >> > > Trying out the ESW wiki is a tangible contribution, so thanks > for giving it a go. > > But note that W3C WGs are obliged to address all the issues they take on. > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address > > ... > Dan, thanks for explaining. I didn't actually realize the ramifications of creating an issue list. I was envisioning more of a "current discussions" list where the discussions can be tagged and a summary can be maintained. I wasn't envisioning forcing the WG to address every one per se. Is it possible to instead view the list as "discussions" instead of "issues" so as not to trigger the formal requirements you mention? -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org http://atlanta-web.org - http://t.oolicio.us "It never ceases to amaze how many people will proactively debate away attempts to improve the web..."
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 05:32:27 UTC