- From: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:38:22 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
> I say such a control is impossible. Not in the "I don't know how so > I say it's impossible" way but in the real "Not going to work" > impossible way. Assuming you create a fully working WYSIWYG editor > which can be styled (how? extensions to css as well? Sub-elements?) > and customized (with like 100 attributes ranging from > boldbutton="yes" to output="xhtml-strict") you're still not > targeting 100% of users. Someone wants a feature which we didn't > think of and we're back to native control vs. JavaScript > implementation vs. XUL implementation Well, if we had to provide for a full fledged, styled editor that targeted 100% of the users, I would agree with you. Fortunately we don't have to be quite so abmitious. Even a single, limited xhtml editor would make a lot of CMS developers & users happy, I think, provided that it is sufficiently user friendly and provides valid XML markup. And it would certainly represent a huge improvement over the current situation. -- Henrik
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:39:04 UTC