W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2007

Re: [whatwg] Video proposals

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:48:46 +0900
Message-ID: <45FD898E.8020107@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: public-html@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren schreef:
>> Is there going to be an <audio> element as well?
> Maybe. It's not entirely clear to me how an <audio> element would work 
> and what it's purpose would be.

You do not see a purpose in an <audio> element, but you do see one in 
<video>? Exactly the same arguments apply, except that video is pretty 
popular nowadays with Youtube and all, and audio less so. Although there 
are plenty of Myspace pages with a music player on it.

>> Why not <media>, since the principles of video and audio are 
>> basically the same?
> Some principles are arguably similar (such as having a timeline). 
> However, video can have things like subtitles, has things like 
> intrinsic height/width, et cetera. 

Audio can have lyrics, just to name something. And meta-information 
(ID3) about the title, artist, composer, and also an image (of the cover 
of the CD).


Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!!
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.

Received on Sunday, 18 March 2007 18:49:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:21:34 UTC