- From: Bill Mason <w3c@accessibleinter.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:03:16 -0700
- To: Sandy Smith <ssmith@forumone.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Sandy Smith wrote: > A use case for the semantic difference is writing an application to find > all the acronyms in a document and replace them with their called-out > equivalents. With <acronym> this is easy. With only <abbr> I have to > determine whether or not the content looks like an acronym so I'm not > calling out Mr. or Mrs. by mistake. > > If you're going to drop one, I suggest <abbr>, as I have seen far fewer > cases of people actually marking up an abbreviation than an acronym, and > far more novel acronyms are used in writing than novel abbreviations > that would need explaining. And then what would you do when I asked you to write an application to find all the abbreviations and replace then with their called-out equivalents? Further, web content accessibility guidelines do not, to my knowledge, make a distinction between needing to "explain" abbreviations that are "novel" versus all. -- Bill Mason Accessible Internet w3c@accessibleinter.net http://accessibleinter.net/
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 20:03:35 UTC