- From: Sandy Smith <ssmith@forumone.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:51:12 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
- cc: Bill Mason <w3c@accessibleinter.net>
- Message-ID: <17E4B262-D856-43A9-9118-FD6B49633DE8@forumone.com>
On Mar 15, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Bill Mason wrote: > And then what would you do when I asked you to write an application > to find all the abbreviations and replace then with their called- > out equivalents? If we have both <acronym> and <abbr>, it's trivial. If we have only <acronym>, well, I'm betting you'll ask me to do this less often than the reverse, as it is not customary to call out Mr. (Mister) in English or Ing. (inżynier) in Polish. I'd prefer to keep both, but if one has to go, my vote is <abbr>. > Further, web content accessibility guidelines do not, to my > knowledge, make a distinction between needing to "explain" > abbreviations that are "novel" versus all. Nor was I arguing that they did; I merely pointed out that it is customary to have content creation guidelines in an organization that require the callout of any acronym used for the first time in a document, but rare to have the reverse. Not all semantic meaning is for accessibility. -- Sandy Smith, Manager of Technical Development Forum One Communications, Inc. ssmith@forumone.com tel. 703-548-1855 x28 http://www.forumone.com/
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 20:51:41 UTC