W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2007

Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:02:47 +0100
Message-ID: <460389A7.9010900@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: public-html@w3.org

On 23/03/2007 04:27, Dan Connolly wrote:

> I very much agree; I wonder if I have said anything to suggest
> otherwise. Perhaps it's just worth re-iterating...

Yes, I only wanted it to be very clear for the big crowd of
people who are new here and possibly not aware of the W3C

> Yes, IRC is great when two people happen to have attention to
> spare at the same time, but that's not something to rely on.

Glad we agree.

> That is: a proposal can be generated by a teleconference
> (or a face-to-face meeting), and then go to email (perhaps
> email that announces a survey), and then a week or so later
> I'll announce whether the proposal carried or not. Or if a
> proposal was announced a week before a meeting, I can announce
> the results during a meeting. But we won't generate and decide
> the same proposal in one meeting. We'll always allow a week or
> so of notice by email for group decisions.

Great. Thanks.

Received on Friday, 23 March 2007 08:02:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:21:34 UTC