- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:02:47 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 23/03/2007 04:27, Dan Connolly wrote: > I very much agree; I wonder if I have said anything to suggest > otherwise. Perhaps it's just worth re-iterating... Yes, I only wanted it to be very clear for the big crowd of people who are new here and possibly not aware of the W3C process. > Yes, IRC is great when two people happen to have attention to > spare at the same time, but that's not something to rely on. Glad we agree. > That is: a proposal can be generated by a teleconference > (or a face-to-face meeting), and then go to email (perhaps > email that announces a survey), and then a week or so later > I'll announce whether the proposal carried or not. Or if a > proposal was announced a week before a meeting, I can announce > the results during a meeting. But we won't generate and decide > the same proposal in one meeting. We'll always allow a week or > so of notice by email for group decisions. Great. Thanks. </Daniel>
Received on Friday, 23 March 2007 08:02:47 UTC