- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:48:37 +0900
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Le 27 mars 2007 à 01:45, Daniel Glazman a écrit :
> So students, W3C staff and Hixie ;-) But not me.
Daniel, I can guarantee you that even being W3C staff, it is almost
impossible to follow everything.
* dealing with logistics issues,
* sorting administrative tasks due to invited experts,
* trying to keep up with technical issues to just know what people
are talking about.
:(
I usually leave my IRC client open during the week-end, I haven't
done it this week-end to avoid questions when I have my private life
time, which people seems to forget as well.
IMHO, I have the feeling, that one way of reducing the volume of
discussions is to assign specific tasks for each item.
An example, I have seen people complaining that the abbr vs acronym
issue has [been debated ad nauseam][1]. Then a document should
collect all the arguments, examples, test cases and be published
somewhere on W3C Web site. Next time, end of the discussion for the
proponents by slapping a URI in your face. I wonder if Jukka would
accept to give [his document][2] and/or someone in this group would
accept to do this work.
[1]: http://www.google.com/search?q=abbr%20acronym
[2]: http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/abbr.html
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2007 02:49:20 UTC