- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:03:23 +0900
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Le 25 mars 2007 à 06:26, Maciej Stachowiak a écrit :
> When HTML6 comes out, but there are still HTML5 conformance
> checkers around, wouldn't you want to mark your HTML6 document as
> something that should not necessarily be expected to pass an HTML5
> conformance checker?
> Likewise for HTML5 now and HTML4 validators.
From the discussions on this thread about versioning, I have
identified two classes of products only.
* browsers
* conformance checkers
It seems, there are few products missing in the discussion:
* authoring tools
* converters (from one format to another, from one version to another)
* "semantics" parsers
I'm specifically interested by knowing the opinions of authoring
tools and converters developers.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 03:04:03 UTC