- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:03:23 +0900
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Le 25 mars 2007 à 06:26, Maciej Stachowiak a écrit : > When HTML6 comes out, but there are still HTML5 conformance > checkers around, wouldn't you want to mark your HTML6 document as > something that should not necessarily be expected to pass an HTML5 > conformance checker? > Likewise for HTML5 now and HTML4 validators. From the discussions on this thread about versioning, I have identified two classes of products only. * browsers * conformance checkers It seems, there are few products missing in the discussion: * authoring tools * converters (from one format to another, from one version to another) * "semantics" parsers I'm specifically interested by knowing the opinions of authoring tools and converters developers. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 03:04:03 UTC