public-html@w3.org from March 2007 by author

Alexander Graf

• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: MostlySemanticMarkup (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: RichTextInput03 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: VisibleMetadata (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)

Alexey Feldgendler

• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)

Alfonso

• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)

Ana Barroso

• Re: Glossary of English Terms (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Fwd: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Monday, 26 March)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: wow... (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)

Andrew Sidwell

• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)

Andrey Nikanorov

• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)

Andrés

• Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml? (Thursday, 8 March)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Let every element have a src attribute (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: MostlySemanticMarkup (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: W3C tools (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: W3C tools (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: WF2 step attribute (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: So, I am reading all these interesting threads... (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Hello, comments (was: Re: Whoah There, Turbo) (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (Saturday, 10 March)
• Posting to this list (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml? (Thursday, 8 March)

Arthur Barstow

• Here's Web Forms 2.0 ... (Friday, 9 March)

Arthur Jennings

• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Sunday, 25 March)
• Fwd: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Tuesday, 20 March)

Arun Ranganathan

• Re: <video> element feedback (Wednesday, 28 March)

Asbjørn Ulsberg

• Re: RichTextInput03 (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Adding attributes to elements Generically (was Let every element have a src attribute) (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: cancel. Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• WG Process (was: Re: wow...) (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: wow... (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 12 March)

Battilana, Marco

• Best approach to research (Tuesday, 13 March)

Ben Meadowcroft

• RE: Brainstorming: more structured form submissions (Friday, 30 March)
• Brainstorming: more structured form submissions (Thursday, 29 March)

Benjamin Chait

• Re: wow... (Wednesday, 28 March)

Benjamin West

• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Best approach to research (Wednesday, 14 March)

Benoit Piette

• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 26 March)

Bhasker V Kode

• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Tuesday, 27 March)

Bill Mason

• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy (Thursday, 15 March)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: <video> element feedback (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: <video> element feedback (Wednesday, 28 March)

Brian Suda

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Sunday, 25 March)

Bruce Lawson

• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: E-mail subscription and RSS (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: brainstorming -- SVG -- SMIL-like declarations in HTML (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Friday, 23 March)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: <video> element feedback (Thursday, 29 March)
• W3C tools Re: Named & Numbered Issues was: Leading ... IRC (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: WorkGroup Funding - re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy (Thursday, 15 March)

Chasen Le Hara

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Sunday, 25 March)

Chris Wilson

• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)

Colin Lieberman

• Re: pronunciation and other guides RE: Deprecate <accronym> (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Saturday, 24 March)
• Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Thursday, 15 March)

Craig Saila

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Tuesday, 27 March)

Dailey, David P.

• Re: Design Principles Document update (Saturday, 31 March)
• RE: Brainstorming: Best of All Worlds (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: brainstorming -- SVG -- SMIL-like declarations in HTML (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: declarative expressons in WF2 (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: alternative guides to content (semantic, visual, but not pronunciation) (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: brainstorming -- SVG (Sunday, 25 March)
• pronunciation and other guides RE: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: brainstorming -- SVG (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: brainstorming -- SVG (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: Brainstorming - abbreviations -- usage statistics (Friday, 23 March)
• brainstorming -- SVG (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies (Wednesday, 21 March)
• DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies (Wednesday, 21 March)
• preference for blocks of unrelated comments (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Current Status related to WHATWG (was Multipart response support and other new features) (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Scope of this group (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (handling duplicates) (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (and other new features) (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Use Visible Metadata was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Thursday, 29 March)
• more clear survey announcements [was: let's have an HTML WG teleconference ...] (Wednesday, 28 March)
• cancel. Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Wednesday, 28 March)
• update from Chris Wilson on Microsoft's status (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Tuesday, 27 March)
• story telling and test cases (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: wow... (Tuesday, 27 March)
• changing the email address connected to your HTML WG membership [was: Hello everybody] (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?) (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Sunday, 25 March)
• let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (multi-site/video possibilities) (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: brainstorming -- SVG (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG (Friday, 23 March)
• presentation to IETF in Chicago July 22-27? [Fwd: new W3C HTML WG] (Thursday, 22 March)
• toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Colours on the WG home page (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Wednesday, 21 March)
• HTML WG office hours in IRC, a few wiki topics (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details? (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Here's Web Forms 2.0 ... (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (and market share threshold, and charter changes) (Thursday, 15 March)
• HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)
• brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Monday, 12 March)
• Meet the HTML Working Group chairs in Austin at SxSWi (QA Weblog) (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 9 March)
• call for participation: W3C HTML Working Group (Thursday, 8 March)

Daniel E. Renfer

• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)

Daniel Glazman

• "HTML Email" W3C Workshop (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Monday, 26 March)
• wow... (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Straw man proposal to build an agenda/issue list (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• HTML_WG.init() (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 12 March)
• WG membership (Monday, 12 March)

Daniel Schattenkirchner

• Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Friday, 23 March)

Dao Gottwald

• Re: Let every element have a src attribute (Thursday, 29 March)
• Let every element have a src attribute (Wednesday, 28 March)

Dave Raggett

• RE: declarative expressons in WF2 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: declarative expressons in WF2 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: WF2 step attribute (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Sunday, 25 March)
• WF2 step attribute (Sunday, 25 March)
• declarative expressons in WF2 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Friday, 23 March)
• Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF? (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Is HTML a final form medium like PDF? (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 12 March)
• Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 12 March)

David Dailey

• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: brainstorming -- SVG (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies (Wednesday, 21 March)

David Hyatt

• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Monday, 12 March)

David Håsäther

• Re: Posting to this list (Monday, 12 March)

Deeder

• Re: Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be...xhtml? (Thursday, 8 March)

Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)

• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF? (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: So, I am reading all these interesting threads... (Monday, 19 March)
• So, I am reading all these interesting threads... (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)

Dharmesh Mistry

• RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Tuesday, 13 March)

Diego La Monica

• Fwd: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)

Doug

• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Monday, 26 March)

Doug Jones

• Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms (Thursday, 29 March)
• Glossary of English Terms (Wednesday, 28 March)

Doug Schepers

• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)

Eric Bednarz

• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• IMG WIDTH/HEIGHT attributes (was: [whatwg] Video proposals) (Monday, 19 March)

Eric Daspet

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Sunday, 25 March)

Espen Antonsen - 24SevenOffice

• FW:Re: Multipart response support (Friday, 30 March)
• RE:Re: Multipart response support (Friday, 30 March)
• RE:Re: Multipart response support (Thursday, 29 March)
• RE:Re: RichTextInput03 (Thursday, 29 March)

Gareth Hay

• Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: RichTextInput03 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)

Gavin Pearce

• RE: People's Location in the HTML WG (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• HTML should be replaced by Flash (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• WorkGroup Funding - re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• RE: WYSIWYM editors (Monday, 19 March)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Saturday, 31 March)
• WYSIWYM editors (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• apologies for multiple posts of identical message (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)

Guillaume Guerin

• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: HTML should be replaced by Flash (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: MostlySemanticMarkup (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• Printing a review copy of Web Apps 1.0 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Meeting at XTech (was: Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG) (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: brainstorming -- SVG (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• No normative schema (was: Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG) (Friday, 23 March)
• Affiliation disclosure (Tuesday, 20 March)

Henrik Dvergsdal

• Scope of this group (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: RichTextInput03 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Test case, XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Rich text input control (was: XML input control) (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)
• XML input control (Thursday, 22 March)

Henrik Lied

• Re: Posting to this list (Thursday, 8 March)

Håkon Wium Lie

• Re: MostlySemanticMarkup (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: <video> element feedback (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Friday, 16 March)
• RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 12 March)

Ian Hickson

• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: DOMObject.firstChild inconsistencies (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (and market share threshold, and charter changes) (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details? (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] call for participation: W3C HTML Working Group (Thursday, 8 March)

Isac Lagerblad

• RE: Colours on the WG home page (Thursday, 22 March)

James Graham

• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)

Jason A. Lefkowitz

• Re: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (Monday, 26 March)

Jeff Cutsinger

• Re: wow... (Monday, 26 March)

Jim Barraud

• Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments (Wednesday, 21 March)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Versioning information (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: No normative schema (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)

John Joseph Bachir

• Microsoft's involvement in the WG (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?) (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?) (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (fwd) (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)

Joost de Valk

• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 12 March)

Jough Dempsey

• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Thursday, 15 March)

Julian Reschke

• Re: FW:Re: Multipart response support (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)

Julien Royer

• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Wednesday, 14 March)

Justin Anthony Knapp

• E-mail subscription and RSS (Friday, 30 March)

Kai Hendry

• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Sunday, 25 March)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Metadata Authoring Capabilities (Friday, 30 March)
• Metadata Authoring Capabilities (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Design Principles Document update (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: VisibleMetadata (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: VisibleMetadata (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 28 March)
• People's Location in the HTML WG (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: W3C tools (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: W3C tools (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Colours on the WG home page (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: HTML WG office hours in IRC, a few wiki topics (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: HTML WG office hours in IRC, a few wiki topics (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 9 March)

Kempen, E.J.F. van

• RE: Whoah There, Turbo (Friday, 16 March)
• RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)

Klotz, Leigh

• RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• RE: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 12 March)

L. David Baron

• Re: Design Principles Document update (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: W3C tools (Sunday, 25 March)
• Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Regarding the Patent Policy (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy (Thursday, 15 March)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Metadata Authoring Capabilities (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Brainstorming: more structured form submissions (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Let every element have a src attribute (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: story telling and test cases (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: HTML parsing, <script>, and document.write() test/issue details? (Thursday, 15 March)

Laurens Holst

• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Saturday, 31 March)
• Versioning information (was: Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5) (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Design Principles Document update (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: <video> element feedback (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: story telling and test cases (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: <video> element feedback (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: <video> element feedback (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: <video> element feedback (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)

Lee Roberts

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Saturday, 24 March)
• RE: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Saturday, 24 March)

liorean

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Saturday, 17 March)
• Colours on the WG home page (Friday, 16 March)

Luka Kladaric

• Re: Posting to this list (handling duplicates) (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Scope of this group (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Microsoft's involvement in the WG (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Design Principles Document update (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Design Principles Document update (Thursday, 29 March)
• Design Principles Document update (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: RichTextInput03 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: VisibleMetadata (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: MostlySemanticMarkup (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: VisibleMetadata (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Proposed Design Principles (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Factual error was Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Regarding the Patent Policy (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Monday, 12 March)
• Whoah There, Turbo (Monday, 12 March)

Magnus Kristiansen

• Re: Posting to this list (Saturday, 31 March)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Saturday, 17 March)

Matt Freels

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Monday, 26 March)

Matthew Ratzloff

• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: WG Process (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: wow... (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Saturday, 24 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: <video> element feedback (Tuesday, 20 March)
• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)

Matthew Raymond

• Comments on XForms Transitional (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Fwd: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms (Friday, 30 March)
• <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: RichTextInput03 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Friday, 16 March)
• Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Thursday, 15 March)

Mihai Sucan

• Re: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)

Mike Schinkel

• Current Status related to WHATWG (was Multipart response support and other new features) (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Design Principles Document update (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Design Principles Document update (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: RichTextInput03 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: VisibleMetadata (Thursday, 29 March)
• AbbrAcronym01: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms (Thursday, 29 March)
• Adding attributes to elements Generically (was Let every element have a src attribute) (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: RichTextInput03 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: DocType02: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: SPAM-LOW: story telling and test cases (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: toward an issues list/agenda for the HTML WG (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: VisibleMetadata (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: VisibleMetadata (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RichTextInput03: Rich text input control (was: XML input control) (Tuesday, 27 March)
• DocType02: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• AbbrAcronym01: Was Deprecate <acronym> (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: XML input control (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: W3C tools Re: Named & Numbered Issues was: Leading ... IRC (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading theForefront - with IRC ! ?) (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?) (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• Proposing Named & Numbered Issues for HTML (was: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ?) (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Sunday, 25 March)

Murray Maloney

• Re: Design Principles Document update (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Design Principles Document update (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: MostlySemanticMarkup (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: MostlySemanticMarkup (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: VisibleMetadata (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: MostlySemanticMarkup (Wednesday, 28 March)
• MostlySemanticMarkup (Wednesday, 28 March)
• VisibleMetadata (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Straw man proposal to build an agenda/issue list (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF? (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: preference for blocks of unrelated comments (Wednesday, 21 March)

nene@triin.net

• Re: XML input control (Friday, 23 March)

Niko Neugebauer

• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• RE: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Wednesday, 14 March)

Noah Slater

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Sunday, 25 March)

Olivier GENDRIN

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Saturday, 24 March)

Razvan MIHAIU

• Hello everybody (Wednesday, 14 March)

Rene Saarsoo

• Re: RichTextInput03 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Rich text input control (was: XML input control) (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: XML input control (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: WF2 step attribute (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Friday, 23 March)

Rick Mans

• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)

Rimantas Liubertas

• Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)

Robert Accettura

• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)

Robert Brodrecht

• Re: cancel. Re: let's have an HTML WG teleconference Thu, 29 March (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Multipart response support (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: pronunciation and other guides RE: Deprecate <accronym> (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations) (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: face to face meeting host offers for the HTML WG? (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Video proposals (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)

Robert Sayre

• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)

sajid saiyed

• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Colours on the WG home page (Friday, 23 March)
• New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Wednesday, 14 March)

Sander Tekelenburg

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Sunday, 25 March)
• RE: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)

Sandy Smith

• Re: Deprecate <acronym> (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: WYSIWYM editors (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)

Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer

• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Brainstorming: Best of all Worlds (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Is HTML a final form medium like PDF? (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: brainstorming: test cases, issues, goals, etc. (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Hello, comments (was: Re: Whoah There, Turbo) (Tuesday, 13 March)

Shadow2531

• Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback (Thursday, 29 March)

Shawn Medero

• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: HTML WG Face to face meeting call for interest (Wednesday, 21 March)

Sierk Bornemann

• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Preparing to launch the Forms Task Force ... (Wednesday, 14 March)

Simon J. Hernandez

• New Public mailing list - public-html (Wednesday, 7 March)

Simon Pieters

• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)

T.V Raman

• Re: Use Visible Metadata was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Visible MetaData == "Visible to whom?" was Re: Design Principles (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: RichTextInput03 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: RichTextInput03 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposed Design Principles (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: MostlySemanticMarkup (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Use Visible Metadata was Re: Design Principles (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: declarative expressons in WF2 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: declarative expressons in WF2 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Brainstorming - abbreviations (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Posting to this list (Monday, 12 March)

Thomas Pike

• Re: Posting to this list (Friday, 30 March)

Tim Brown

• Re: Leading the Forefront - with IRC ! ? (Friday, 23 March)

Timmy Jose

• Re: Whoah There, Turbo (Tuesday, 13 March)

Tommaso R. Donnarumma

• Re: Proposed requirement: don't break the Web (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 (Sunday, 25 March)

w3c@robertdot.org

• Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile (Wednesday, 14 March)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2007 23:55:25 UTC