- From: Magnus Kristiansen <magnusrk+w3c@pvv.org>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:14:58 +0200
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:43:23 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:38:27 +0200, Alexander Graf > <a.graf@aetherworld.org> wrote: >>> Having the list mailing software set Reply-To automatically is a very >>> contentious issue. Every time the issue pops up on my local LUG’s >>> mailing list the argument goes on for days. :) See for example: >>> >>> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >> >> See for example: >> >> http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml > > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.html All three are from 2000, and the anti arguments lean partially on features in specific clients. Maybe someone could write up the pros and cons in updated form, referencing the mail clients in common use today. -- Magnus Kristiansen "Don't worry; the Universe IS out to get you."
Received on Saturday, 31 March 2007 14:13:03 UTC