- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:30:01 +0900
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Le 30 mars 2007 à 15:20, Lachlan Hunt a écrit :
>> 2006. Browser implements it in their UI
> 2006. Realised it was a mistake to require duplication of data in
> the head and body using both <link> and <a>. Defined how to link
> to feeds using <a> [1|2] and began implementing [3].
hmmm I have a different reading of your links. They *never* requested
duplication. It is not about duplication, but about adding the
possibility to have a rel="feed" in the content. As long as the
authors have the *choice* between a and link. It is fine by me.
For example, I never put links to my RSS feeds in my content and do
not want to do. I have plain control on my head ;)
> [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#feed
> [2] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#alternate
> [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362864
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 06:30:49 UTC