- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:51:00 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 22:53 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > That's a survey I just set up. Please fill it out at your earliest > > convenience. > > Could we have a question regarding whether we think we should have one at > all or not? The questionaire seems to somewhat assume that a telecon is a > good idea, but several people have commented on this list negatively about > the idea. Right now, the only way to say that in the survey is to say that > the notice was insufficient, which is not really the same thing. Not so. It says: "If you see any reason that this teleconference shouldn't happen at all, please put it in a comment." -- http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/tel29mar/ And it doesn't assume that a telecon is a good idea; it's explicit about my reasons for calling one... "It seems we have enough agenda topics and issues[1] to merit a teleconference." [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 02:51:11 UTC