- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:56:23 +0900
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Le 30 mars 2007 à 04:04, Maciej Stachowiak a écrit :
> The "Visible Metadata" principle is favored by Microformats
> advocates (among others), but objected to by RDF / Semantic Web
> advocates.
Just to kill a myth now:
Not at all :) Both groups favor and like visible metadata: RDFa,
eRDF, GRRDL.
The differences are more in technological views.
The text is now:
VisibleMetadata: Metadata is more effective when it is
directly tied to user-visible data. Invisible metadata is
often incorrect, out of date, or intentionally deceptive.
For example, <a> is more trustworthy as a cross-reference
than <link>. User-visible tags are more trustworthy than
<meta> keywords.
What about:
VisibleMetadata: Metadata is more effective when it is
directly tied to user-visible data.
Invisible metadata which are tied directly to the content
are in some circumstances difficult to maintain by authors.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 03:57:17 UTC